Skip to main content

HeartGuard VR: Immersive Romance Scam Education

Octavia Lea ; Lynsay A. Shepherd ; Andrea Szymkowiak (2024) — Lecture notes in computer science

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-78269-5_19 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Book Chapter
Country:   United Kingdom
Tags:   Romance Scams, Scam Education, Social Engineering, Victim Experience, Virtual Reality
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
HeartGuard VR: Immersive Romance Scam Education describes a virtual reality serious game designed to educate the public about romance scams and to reduce victimization through interactive learning. The project situates learning in an immersive VR environment built with Unity and interfaced to VR headsets via SteamVR. In the game, players assume the role of an AI security assistant who classify messages received by the main character, Claire, as genuine or scam. The central narrative follows a romance scam perpetrated by a character named Freddie, with additional conversations to create social realism and to illustrate how scams escalate from a dating app to other channels. The game includes consequences for misclassifications and uses a retro technology aesthetic to frame the user experience, with a final reveal that ties the fiction to real-world outcomes. The study reporting on HeartGuard VR recruited ten participants, conducted ethics-approved testing at Abertay University, and gathered data through a pre- and post-play questionnaire. The evaluation used a modified System Usability Scale to assess usability and a tailored Experience Economy Model to evaluate learning, entertainment, aesthetics, escapism, and overall VR experience. Participants completed demographics and questions about prior VR use and awareness of romance scams. Results indicate an average SUS score of 79.75 (range 72.5–90), suggesting above-average usability, though Cronbach’s alpha was 0.4, reflecting limited internal consistency in this small sample. Most participants were 18–24, resided in the UK or US, and had prior VR experience; about half owned a VR headset and reported little VR sickness. Overall, the authors propose HeartGuard VR as a potential publicly available intervention to raise awareness and defenses against romance scams, while acknowledging the study’s limitations and the need for broader testing.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Existing text-based safety campaigns may have limited engagement, and relevant dating-platform safety information can be difficult for users to locate. The evaluation provides only preliminary evidence: the small sample limits generalisability, and retention of learning has not been tested longitudinally.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The available text identifies the chapter as an immersive virtual-reality education work about romance scams, but provides no chapter abstract, methods, participants, intervention details, or evaluation results.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The supplied extract contains only the chapter title and contents entry, not the chapter body. Its empirical design, sample, measures, findings, and limitations cannot be assessed.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Further develop HeartGuard VR for deployment as a public intervention by law enforcement, dating platforms, and academia. Conduct a larger study to improve generalisability, and use a longitudinal design to assess whether players retain romance-scam information over time.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.