Skip to main content

Unveiling the Romance Scam Scheme: Psychological Manipulation and Its Impact on Victims

Syakira Yuniar Yosiandra ; Dewi Saraswati Sakariah (2024) — HUMANIKA

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This publication presents a neutral, source-grounded synopsis of a 2024 literature review that examines romance scam schemes in Japanese society. The authors aim to illuminate how perpetrators manipulate victims and to describe the resulting psychological and financial harms, drawing on secondary sources including online news portals and social media reports. Their approach combines qualitative description with dramaturgical and psychological manipulation theories to interpret patterns of interaction between scammers and victims, particularly in online dating contexts. The authors identify a structured sequence of tactics used by perpetrators. Key elements include providing fake identities (catfishing) and avoiding direct, in-person contact; employing dramaturgical storytelling and props to present a convincing “front stage” while concealing the back story; and using love bombing to rapidly cultivate emotional dependence. These tactics are conditioned to elicit trust and commitment, enabling financial exploitation through requests for money, often framed by narratives of illness, danger, or urgent need. The analysis relies on documented conversations and screenshots from six cases, illustrating how exaggerated affection and fabricated circumstances lead victims to transfer funds, sometimes after enduring significant psychological distress. The review concludes that romance scams exert substantial emotional and financial impact on victims, including anxiety, depression, and in some cases long-term mental health effects. The authors advocate for counseling and supportive interventions for victims and call for further research to understand long-term consequences and to develop more effective prevention strategies. They emphasize that the phenomena are shaped by social and technological dynamics that facilitate online, anonymous interaction.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a gap in prior romance-scam research by focusing on Japanese society and using Japanese news and media reports. It also frames scams through dramaturgy and psychological manipulation, emphasizing perpetrators' role performance, motivations, schemes, and victim impacts.

Methods

This qualitative descriptive literature review analyzed secondary Japanese materials, including books, journal articles, official reports, Ameblo, Newspostseven, Instagram, and victim-shared conversation screenshots. It examined six Japanese cases through content analysis. Goffman's dramaturgy informed analysis of offender identity performance and communication avoidance; Fromm's psychological-manipulation theory informed analysis of emotional control and victim impacts.

Limitations

The study relies on secondary online sources and six cases, including victim accounts that use pseudonyms. Its descriptive literature-review design cannot establish prevalence, causal relationships, or representativeness among Japanese romance-scam victims. Evidence is drawn largely from media reports, social-media content, and selected screenshots rather than systematic primary data collection.

Future Work

Further research is recommended to examine the long-term impacts of romance scams and develop more effective prevention strategies.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.