Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own copy reports five arrests for professional name-lending; the title questions consultation handling despite1800 requests. The questioned conduct is an allegation, not1800 proven victims/cases or a completed refund. Co-arrests do not establish one romance organization or all principal guilt. Exact own record W20240527_20240602C0004.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
Investigation or court: Japan
Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific procedural contexts
field
desc
reason
Own copy reports five arrests for professional name-lending; the title questions consultation handling despite1800 requests. The questioned conduct is an allegation, not1800 proven victims/cases or a completed refund. Co-arrests do not establish one romance organization or all principal guilt.
subject
川口正輝
subject basis
own_explicit_name
reported outcome
own lawyer and others arrested on professional-offence suspicion
subject name literals
Item 1
川口正輝
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
title
reason
Own copy reports five arrests for professional name-lending; the title questions consultation handling despite1800 requests. The questioned conduct is an allegation, not1800 proven victims/cases or a completed refund. Co-arrests do not establish one romance organization or all principal guilt.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
arrest
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 02a8057dd5d7de7eeb612b6816df48d92019aaf05efdf7f037d08d836d162323 Decision: 64a31ec3183e3efb94cf42c0e21726d5be508994a6554b6ef52d07f4cd90121c Base reviewed revision: 373a421dd410519e029283bd6accf1d64da4ac773481514c579f6e7b49bfb484
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.