Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

福島県内被害は4.5億円超 1~5月、投資詐欺やロマンス詐欺

www.minyu-net.comJapaneseObserved 2024-05-22
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Keep more than 4億5000万円 as provisional combined loss, and the separate previous-year 2億2902万円 comparator. January–May20 and previous year are relative/partial periods: no incident calendar year is inferred from publication. Fukushima is a stated regional place; national location is not supplied separately. Romance and investment labels do not describe their relationship mechanism.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Keep more than 4億5000万円 as provisional combined loss, and the separate previous-year 2億2902万円 comparator. January–May20 and previous year are relative/partial periods: no incident calendar year is inferred from publication. Fukushima is a stated regional place; national location is not supplied separately. Romance and investment labels do not describe their relationship mechanism.
field
interpretation
context kind
ROOT_qualified_source_specific_current_interpretation
own role source layer limits
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
unknown role meaning
No approved assertion of that role; not a categorical source denial
source truth verified
false
case identity verified
false
actual current membership
record id
W20240520_20240526C0002
input hash
27ffbbc7700a594690604777382500edd0d7725fc5dd3db244efe6321afc01c7
decision id
d289df0d69d2e3680d093d8b97bbcf7d2a5cdf89bbca1c15c3985187ccd219cc
document id
075b9c409d29bf36a3f73794770d806715eba00ebf2c5697707560d2ed2170c7
weekly status
accepted
actual current status
accepted
actual current input hash
27ffbbc7700a594690604777382500edd0d7725fc5dd3db244efe6321afc01c7
current layer disposition
new_uncoded_current
actual current decision id
d289df0d69d2e3680d093d8b97bbcf7d2a5cdf89bbca1c15c3985187ccd219cc
eligible for current import
true
currentcoding33 SQL approved
false
ownrole assertion scope limits
Item 1
role
reported_development
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
reported_loss
exact reason
Recognized provisional mixed-fraud loss aggregate, not unique cases or inferred calendar year.
assertion index
0
final QC role code join not bypassed
true
exact ROOT qualified ownrole record note
DRAFT from explicit ROOT selections and ROOT-reviewed original notes; original source truth not verified. All original actor/place/calendar/development proposals remain in immutable source notes and the exact contextual-history copy below. Unknown roles mean no selected valid assertion in this draft, not categorical source absence. No final QC/currentcoding33 approval.
all stronger current overlaps and21plus3U preservation still required
true
is entire code dimension denial
false
exact ROOT qualified record note
Keep more than 4億5000万円 as provisional combined loss, and the separate previous-year 2億2902万円 comparator. January–May20 and previous year are relative/partial periods: no incident calendar year is inferred from publication. Fukushima is a stated regional place; national location is not supplied separately. Romance and investment labels do not describe their relationship mechanism.
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
reported_loss
reason
Recognized provisional mixed-fraud loss aggregate, not unique cases or inferred calendar year.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
783766a670c6d122c6bdc02c783fb7d7aa8a9dd04216fd12ac0671888a87de2c
current source binding
input hash
27ffbbc7700a594690604777382500edd0d7725fc5dd3db244efe6321afc01c7
decision id
d289df0d69d2e3680d093d8b97bbcf7d2a5cdf89bbca1c15c3985187ccd219cc
document id
075b9c409d29bf36a3f73794770d806715eba00ebf2c5697707560d2ed2170c7
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
5abc52d61e4c3db843760ef2851f5b1f4fcaad73c7f96823ec184d96908e6969
finding evidence sha256
608f62bfbe89a1ea18734f50514cd5b416ef995b085ec6e1b1fa6f16f55a8853
enrichment payload sha256
6dd22864e92e6cbcf4a2e52896153e2b9ede4a35c3f20a205ddba434cbe1b1d4
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/075b9c409d29bf36a3f73794770d806715eba00ebf2c5697707560d2ed2170c7/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
6f6676290af1944edab1f775214355616bdd0b347c934fcce7d3dec6f4f8f24d

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed

Provisional combined investment-and-romance recognised loss; not romance-only loss or independent cases.

Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 075b9c409d29bf36a3f73794770d806715eba00ebf2c5697707560d2ed2170c7
Decision: d289df0d69d2e3680d093d8b97bbcf7d2a5cdf89bbca1c15c3985187ccd219cc
Base reviewed revision: 783766a670c6d122c6bdc02c783fb7d7aa8a9dd04216fd12ac0671888a87de2c

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.