Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug mit «Rosenheim-Cops»

www.antenne.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Each of six own copies has the same explicit Internet-Liebesbetrug and publicized-case context. Retain only the supported online dimension while money and relationship mechanics remain insufficient. Copy count is not independent evidence or incidence; no person, geography or dates are added.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Each of six own copies has the same explicit Internet-Liebesbetrug and publicized-case context. Retain only the supported online dimension while money and relationship mechanics remain insufficient. Copy count is not independent evidence or incidence; no person, geography or dates are added.
subject
own_reported_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_inference_limits_retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
285d1ab0f23daf8ce4318ddc797fb4db92c692ed68def44181e138d75f7f8e1a
current source binding
input hash
c1c49fef805e4c94d2b92fc3d836c06c94fb2c189b66ef275ed50e1de5f53efd
decision id
9c91a2664a99d1086fe93fb3cb88ad1aad57d64a17bf82653d870ec55ff6aa2a
document id
07cee5ecf94679e11a001929d023617258cb0958d76f06acafb2c1f7c307f093
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
1c790ea85eb44f1e1a16e18cfb7da2e7be9c607a1e332a877d6468677daafe32
finding evidence sha256
5a8c2d841ef1714ed159290ce0c8e7b49d84ba9efd011537cf88c5633b5917c4
enrichment payload sha256
434a4b8ccbbb9a838721ba5c857bccbb18e81d3c77e519068b089404162b80e1
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/07cee5ecf94679e11a001929d023617258cb0958d76f06acafb2c1f7c307f093/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
6443a76c225a6b07e7a5faee7dbf160502a37589c3034b9509526c10b469284b

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 07cee5ecf94679e11a001929d023617258cb0958d76f06acafb2c1f7c307f093
Decision: 9c91a2664a99d1086fe93fb3cb88ad1aad57d64a17bf82653d870ec55ff6aa2a
Base reviewed revision: 285d1ab0f23daf8ce4318ddc797fb4db92c692ed68def44181e138d75f7f8e1a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.