Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Husband, wife admit they stole $4.5M in online romance scam

www.nj.comEnglishObserved 2024-03-26
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Historical review note: No prior residence, victim count, duration or currency conversion is borrowed from other reports. NJ domain alone is not a country role.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
reported_loss
reason
Apply the mandatory ROOT aggregate qualification to the couple's admitted take; no net-loss calculation, separate-case count or plea inferred. Original authored stage: completed. Own reported aggregate theft admission, not an independently verified net loss or currency ISO.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0954fd13159b22a6d84d3572645388eed7f3de8961d6d35326d12b196dd919b7
current source binding
input hash
65e7d0385e6d7471d77adc5d9b6f3cb1942b3e115d9fd1d22b023feb6121c80f
decision id
73da47d9c2a157374543217bec8c0b961c4d15d8c142d9cceb3cb7b4c3eb12a5
document id
08d5d279d8bf3f855432df6489141fddf184e0a8b6c2ba5705e2934ed8703e9d
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e8c043f427f6320c2589ac74d01bd5e0dcb043003970babd14e3a02f9d0b12d9
finding evidence sha256
16b3b0f57153e6cda0b94354ca023bc497d3734d34eb07ebbc413f02be099857
enrichment payload sha256
676467d4854a3e43f0e5e9c983c34e52798ed0c4861f6a8365c1935f719f37ba
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/08d5d279d8bf3f855432df6489141fddf184e0a8b6c2ba5705e2934ed8703e9d/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4be738d108a493d4bd0b9ce442b2db821d9c674bfe4d39d71b5204ce4be73119

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed

Reported admission of aggregate theft in one described scheme; currency symbol is not expanded.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesinsufficient context
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of laborinsufficient context
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 08d5d279d8bf3f855432df6489141fddf184e0a8b6c2ba5705e2934ed8703e9d
Decision: 73da47d9c2a157374543217bec8c0b961c4d15d8c142d9cceb3cb7b4c3eb12a5
Base reviewed revision: 0954fd13159b22a6d84d3572645388eed7f3de8961d6d35326d12b196dd919b7

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.