Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Love-Scamming: Frau (49) aus dem Landkreis Kelheim fällt auf Betrüger herein

www.mittelbayerische.deGermanObserved 2024-08-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own49-year-old Kelheim woman story says it first seemed a love relationship, then a rude awakening. This supports source-alleged fabricated relationship context; no money amount/payment method or explicit post-scam psychological condition is stated. BöseErwachen is not itself a clinical diagnosis. Two URL copies are not two distinct people or independent cases. No technique, court outcome, event year or refund imported. Root own-role qualification: Own Kelheim49female title/preview describes LoveScam/apparent relationship and discovery of fraud. No explicit paid sum, asset route, calendar date, actual legal outcome/refund or clinical harm; falling for a scam does not itself establish an unstated completed monetary transfer. Two exact copies are not independent cases.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Kelheim49female title/preview describes LoveScam/apparent relationship and discovery of fraud. No explicit paid sum, asset route, calendar date, actual legal outcome/refund or clinical harm; falling for a scam does not itself establish an unstated completed monetary transfer. Two exact copies are not independent cases.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_limits
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f8bc1359140d6d06e7f3c9332d49ac8903dfc2650a1d17664bd9626911bebe05
current source binding
input hash
98bc1cb9260b7f22fc6740d62e628528281e138a4897808ef8ccb11ee701b7be
decision id
1ee797f0e6aac5bea17415998679663e8919e1d08a614a519d6503f4b1b60ad6
document id
0eb56e42d747d00d26341408f1f44c96fb22bdc0a9c4b134936062080a5ee271
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
b8ba1ba6c3fd0306dcbb9513fb029a1e3dce8eb517bf94247b91ea6b4cce8173
finding evidence sha256
349069fce66c89cbf585670789ca347586f0e4c8c6f8b1656c54702e3c2ae65c
enrichment payload sha256
ad4c4eada206aa1fe012dd9d89e870d6d2c706678b05efd5c25f6144ddf0398b
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/0eb56e42d747d00d26341408f1f44c96fb22bdc0a9c4b134936062080a5ee271/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
5fbdc69940a133e9bc713f5b1c397af83c15ce7948e74d51c78ef0e21c53f70f

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 0eb56e42d747d00d26341408f1f44c96fb22bdc0a9c4b134936062080a5ee271
Decision: 1ee797f0e6aac5bea17415998679663e8919e1d08a614a519d6503f4b1b60ad6
Base reviewed revision: f8bc1359140d6d06e7f3c9332d49ac8903dfc2650a1d17664bd9626911bebe05

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.