Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「金の受取人になってほしい」 ロマンス詐欺で小坂の男性、124万円被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-22
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

The request 金の受取人になってほしい is preserved literally as a proposed gold/money-recipient pretext. It does not establish receiving or laundering other victims’ funds; facilitation remains insufficient. The romance label plus reported financial loss does not explain fabricated affection or identity. No year is assigned to day21, nor country from language, region or yen.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
The request 金の受取人になってほしい is preserved literally as a proposed gold/money-recipient pretext. It does not establish receiving or laundering other victims’ funds; facilitation remains insufficient. The romance label plus reported financial loss does not explain fabricated affection or identity. No year is assigned to day21, nor country from language, region or yen.
field
interpretation
context kind
ROOT_qualified_source_specific_current_interpretation
own role source layer limits
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
unknown role meaning
No approved assertion of that role; not a categorical source denial
source truth verified
false
case identity verified
false
actual current membership
record id
W20240520_20240526C0004
input hash
9c11d9414fb8740fb1758e606d0e8c08b27459bfbdd60db84ba0005d74231121
decision id
c09e496a2503e1a3a1475772d173e113e88d6550785a18f0faee721aab6d218f
document id
12a62b161cf2d4f212bbbc2af82d75b2703f8df931f389d9935097fe0a821d8a
weekly status
accepted
actual current status
accepted
actual current input hash
9c11d9414fb8740fb1758e606d0e8c08b27459bfbdd60db84ba0005d74231121
current layer disposition
new_uncoded_current
actual current decision id
c09e496a2503e1a3a1475772d173e113e88d6550785a18f0faee721aab6d218f
eligible for current import
true
currentcoding33 SQL approved
false
ownrole assertion scope limits
Item 1
role
reported_development
field
development
scope
single_case
value
reported_loss
exact reason
Reported own cash loss; no refund or independent truth.
assertion index
0
final QC role code join not bypassed
true
exact ROOT qualified ownrole record note
DRAFT from explicit ROOT selections and ROOT-reviewed original notes; original source truth not verified. All original actor/place/calendar/development proposals remain in immutable source notes and the exact contextual-history copy below. Unknown roles mean no selected valid assertion in this draft, not categorical source absence. No final QC/currentcoding33 approval.
all stronger current overlaps and21plus3U preservation still required
true
is entire code dimension denial
false
exact ROOT qualified record note
The request 金の受取人になってほしい is preserved literally as a proposed gold/money-recipient pretext. It does not establish receiving or laundering other victims’ funds; facilitation remains insufficient. The romance label plus reported financial loss does not explain fabricated affection or identity. No year is assigned to day21, nor country from language, region or yen.
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
reported_loss
reason
Reported own cash loss; no refund or independent truth.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
172c3d791be5c042b866eba3b238a5c43591a6ddb6b443dfefee1495224eeb08
current source binding
input hash
9c11d9414fb8740fb1758e606d0e8c08b27459bfbdd60db84ba0005d74231121
decision id
c09e496a2503e1a3a1475772d173e113e88d6550785a18f0faee721aab6d218f
document id
12a62b161cf2d4f212bbbc2af82d75b2703f8df931f389d9935097fe0a821d8a
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
d42b99e7cdb21f2c0dea5b44c9b030a2b01669dbf24e0c0a7ea401bfbec23592
finding evidence sha256
6a71ffee7d3d4fefb6bd4c9175c692de8744c3b957756784159925647636902a
enrichment payload sha256
28f7601a9a6bda68f0706d404d66e50516b0ba439e5886e3eff53a1b9cb32ab3
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/12a62b161cf2d4f212bbbc2af82d75b2703f8df931f389d9935097fe0a821d8a/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
dce65e9e2b58cdcaab80245d90c9fa83b03c98d843b7b085a3494500749d5c0e

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

Keep description 1,245,000 yen separate from rounded 124万円 headline.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemeinsufficient context

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 12a62b161cf2d4f212bbbc2af82d75b2703f8df931f389d9935097fe0a821d8a
Decision: c09e496a2503e1a3a1475772d173e113e88d6550785a18f0faee721aab6d218f
Base reviewed revision: 172c3d791be5c042b866eba3b238a5c43591a6ddb6b443dfefee1495224eeb08

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.