Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Suffolk£1400 loss, over120reports and a national over8percent report increase have different reported scopes/denominators. No unique-case/victim incidence or average is computed, unspecified reports are not individual police filings, and last year remains relative without a calendar-year fill.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
Victim location: United Kingdom
Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
desc
reason
Do not conflate national growth with regional losses/counts, infer independently verified people/incidence or a police-report mechanism, or translate last year into an unstated year.
subject
the source-described romance-fraud reports and Suffolk targets
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Reported regional loss and separately scoped report-count/increase claims.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 19d2067141143be879199722ca363c5c5e06b601b36fe66624b6b4bb965378c3 Decision: 6323fd8c7a1f1a632da6750c7323a0ac31877d0daab48c340c428760633fb5a3 Base reviewed revision: 05f8aef24092b2604afaba6a650e8caf706a4aa5ef4542b7cbbf7881676d394d
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.