Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Related mention

How ‘pig butchering’ romance scams siphon millions from Californians every year

www.pasadenastarnews.comEnglishObserved 2024-10-13
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own California annualmillions and sourceclaims familydestruction/retirementplans/suicide association. Broad sourceclaims not clinicalcausalverification or newindividual deaths; retirement plans not established lostjob/housing/essentialneeds.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Broad source-associated families/retirementplans/suicide, not clinicalcause/new dated individual deaths or established daily-needs loss.
subject
California_source_associations
reported outcome
source_claimed_harms
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
5f97ef2e1c2a8eec6533a61fb31b9e09c142ea32404465eefea1525fbfe8bc6e
current source binding
input hash
771a6d8b30161cc8e2e3ceaa5595fca56dfaf5cd249bd2a554fa27954eededf3
decision id
71dbe5a392974b2789421483b590366c05b6d38a4c8bedeba0bc2de0234d39a4
document id
1a4a74f511fb18197c0ee101db5868e668445491899b734e2de0486105f1cd02
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
8a61f8123a1de710f4505918515f60ad088265823896e1dd714fbe2ffa605c3c
finding evidence sha256
4efe838052bb7908d5420d068e12eeb652341ce0a99fc6f528e3c357584a4af8
enrichment payload sha256
9be35b872e0844b2852d0df566d0c4575036039e23977c0e2aa62c8ec8fe5358
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/1a4a74f511fb18197c0ee101db5868e668445491899b734e2de0486105f1cd02/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
26e54ee808aa3209f91a756bdc58bd2c21fdc0bbb8018638e3ce331a52fedaee

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Family and social harm

family distressallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
source associated
Causal claim
source associates

Suicide and self-harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
source associated
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifeinsufficient context
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmreported in available text
Family and social harmreported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 1a4a74f511fb18197c0ee101db5868e668445491899b734e2de0486105f1cd02
Decision: 71dbe5a392974b2789421483b590366c05b6d38a4c8bedeba0bc2de0234d39a4
Base reviewed revision: 5f97ef2e1c2a8eec6533a61fb31b9e09c142ea32404465eefea1525fbfe8bc6e

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.