Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

I thought only fools fell for romance scams, then I lost £100,000...

www.dailymail.co.ukEnglishObserved 2024-07-12
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own first-person title challenges the prior belief that only fools fall for Romance scams after reporting£100,000 loss. Preserve challenged general stigma, not an unsupported admission of self-blame. Contentment on a second date is prior positive feeling, not post-scam psychological injury; no fuller revenge story or actual identity proof is imported.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own first-person title challenges the prior belief that only fools fall for Romance scams after reporting£100,000 loss. Preserve challenged general stigma, not an unsupported admission of self-blame. Contentment on a second date is prior positive feeling, not post-scam psychological injury; no fuller revenge story or actual identity proof is imported.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source subject, loss, stage and inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
8ffef300ef3164819f1af467d213d0b838323c6e9ce6358e3823445918001e79
current source binding
input hash
9e97784a659ce5d108e1b8c30eb47ec74363ccf9b359f055d11588b737543458
decision id
1d8ffdf1d74d0dfea6ae76a5f577248fd3acef442b778b081d8f97f5b1bec7e5
document id
1f29c0aedb89839468fce108212d1e43522efbf8839c879c14a249986c9ac309
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
a4f8f12a5c4e1765e6365e42f01f423fe193bda4e6a10d28293d608c5b4d628e
finding evidence sha256
88dd077e9c586686c85d684711126e3905039755d0117c157889cf8ab67c2bf8
enrichment payload sha256
06156a2dd548bb279743b589f4dc7a32d898aa73efef42c55ea950c76b20a402
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/1f29c0aedb89839468fce108212d1e43522efbf8839c879c14a249986c9ac309/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
9f926f7c90cb609a21ee62ef2e11efde4edf6091e891080c062e70e607f8ee94

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Blame, stigma and responsibility framing

blame challengecommentaryStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingreported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 1f29c0aedb89839468fce108212d1e43522efbf8839c879c14a249986c9ac309
Decision: 1d8ffdf1d74d0dfea6ae76a5f577248fd3acef442b778b081d8f97f5b1bec7e5
Base reviewed revision: 8ffef300ef3164819f1af467d213d0b838323c6e9ce6358e3823445918001e79

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.