Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

加州人最好骗!每年因爱情“杀猪盘”损失近2亿美元 | 文学城电台

www.wenxuecity.comChineseObserved 2024-09-03
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Californiaannualnearly200mUSD Romancepiglossheadline/bestdeceived derogatoryregionalframing. Publisherframing not assessedindividualclinicaltrait/actualcryptotransfer, studyperiod/sample absent andaudionotlistened.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Californiaannualnearly200mUSD Romancepiglossheadline/bestdeceived derogatoryregionalframing. Publisherframing not assessedindividualclinicaltrait/actualcryptotransfer, studyperiod/sample absent andaudionotlistened.
subject
Sep02_unit_78
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
28ba3a632d114c8ee7c6fefbb7dc0e2d1e62a4db2ec935d4c9929009a85b4f95
current source binding
input hash
31727de48dab8a226982c6f312a7256fc86e40c51da20862ffa69303a9d17e52
decision id
5a4c69ecb86b2f4a404527bf2c49f22327f82cd9cd5c42536fadff6911dd01be
document id
27803cd9cd8d595ee41b1b181cf1378acd33ffcebc3b92bbbec27e482e77b61e
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
5d05e5170ca0c63ac2d01bfa493695d9491c6a0e477bfd13bd0d27197442e429
finding evidence sha256
69674a63bec603ba9f453ad07a534f8ab8f16044c09bc83c8074968fde0f3de1
enrichment payload sha256
8d0c2ad80ac7ff64258ea8db5001ed4fffacca83a1ad1a12412f96b3958d85fc
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/27803cd9cd8d595ee41b1b181cf1378acd33ffcebc3b92bbbec27e482e77b61e/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
1a0ea88dd553c00135039f432c13715e1cd1bb814881f44af0512c08460c82ac

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Blame, stigma and responsibility framing

ridicule stigmacommentaryStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingreported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 27803cd9cd8d595ee41b1b181cf1378acd33ffcebc3b92bbbec27e482e77b61e
Decision: 5a4c69ecb86b2f4a404527bf2c49f22327f82cd9cd5c42536fadff6911dd01be
Base reviewed revision: 28ba3a632d114c8ee7c6fefbb7dc0e2d1e62a4db2ec935d4c9929009a85b4f95

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.