Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug mit «Rosenheim-Cops»

www.nw.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own NW copy reports Internet Liebesbetrug and public disclosure of a particular matter, ending after öffentlich gemacht. Keep its online context; the saved words do not identify the precise deception, paid amount, victim, investigation or preventive action. Annual wording and publisher location are not incident-year or country evidence.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own NW copy reports Internet Liebesbetrug and public disclosure of a particular matter, ending after öffentlich gemacht. Keep its online context; the saved words do not identify the precise deception, paid amount, victim, investigation or preventive action. Annual wording and publisher location are not incident-year or country evidence.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source scope/stage/inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
adf96be6ad76a3cf495ad076a084e959c926e51ec850cfd165de2c9b9052c945
current source binding
input hash
79a43ec66946872a06f538c54c85def9b8c07f344b861799755f615bb58a819b
decision id
bc35d4936393226915b75e6420194c071e5cc2a42f3806c19c8fa34aef87ffaa
document id
287ea4d49bb60d4f830ff35a4724cf3295b454b848bcc496a4358ec46d49c9a8
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
803a68748e97ddb0eec7356a94d40c4e028b94204c5823fea74f67f79a6647fc
finding evidence sha256
a55788c1a812439269e4f9e9fad5f6f8f32e5482472ebe3dce4223efc6ad83bb
enrichment payload sha256
7d5bfbb3a5f49b1f36b7d60b1bb70b232d41b08412ed626afaf3add55ae4ddf2
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/287ea4d49bb60d4f830ff35a4724cf3295b454b848bcc496a4358ec46d49c9a8/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
9de634daf8cedb901c9346b1f391fd3d0ed5a7b2a4232d1fe813cc99abaa6c20

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 287ea4d49bb60d4f830ff35a4724cf3295b454b848bcc496a4358ec46d49c9a8
Decision: bc35d4936393226915b75e6420194c071e5cc2a42f3806c19c8fa34aef87ffaa
Base reviewed revision: adf96be6ad76a3cf495ad076a084e959c926e51ec850cfd165de2c9b9052c945

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.