Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Il perd 200 000$ dans une fraude amoureuse: «Desjardins aurait dû me protéger», lance un homme de 84 ans

www.tvanouvelles.caFrenchObserved 2024-06-15
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own 84-year-old man reports $200,000 Romance-fraud loss and crypto investments. Currency ISO is unspecified; investment is not proof of a crypto transfer. His assertion that Desjardins should have protected him is an attributed institutional complaint, not established misconduct. Age is context, not proven vulnerability. Romance mechanism details, event years, diagnosis and recovery are absent.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own 84-year-old man reports $200,000 Romance-fraud loss and crypto investments. Currency ISO is unspecified; investment is not proof of a crypto transfer. His assertion that Desjardins should have protected him is an attributed institutional complaint, not established misconduct. Age is context, not proven vulnerability. Romance mechanism details, event years, diagnosis and recovery are absent.
subject
own 84-year-old complainant
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
reported loss and attributed bank-protection complaint
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
652e82c9f9be5db1093110f210ed1248022c885bf8838dbe50266c44a47cfc17
current source binding
input hash
4efebf8b61cd6345bd5cc943a523f0cc10e5cf73bd1d9bcb15bbeb077232fb4c
decision id
bf606010641e0b6616f61114dcf8515f4632323cf3984d67c7a24aa7bbc43007
document id
3582caea8185ee320262b7ebdf3c6a16199e6356b6f61c35e4ca1e70477d9336
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
75450aabd49c31813dd2024d068c9023075268e2c9bfcc32600453c8c68517b4
finding evidence sha256
4ba9a244faf3359ba5e83c062698084688ee2c0b10762497c240e0a4e2af1f2f
enrichment payload sha256
d02f23932319dacad0a74b9a8aed86a384d6e7326a45617a49c5f0da4d4e473e
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/3582caea8185ee320262b7ebdf3c6a16199e6356b6f61c35e4ca1e70477d9336/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
2f9dd7b0fc816dff81f6a5b40f9d55a4470583f8884587fa18b2eb3629fa99c2

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Institutional barriers or harmful response

alleged misconductallegationStage: unclear
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsereported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 3582caea8185ee320262b7ebdf3c6a16199e6356b6f61c35e4ca1e70477d9336
Decision: bf606010641e0b6616f61114dcf8515f4632323cf3984d67c7a24aa7bbc43007
Base reviewed revision: 652e82c9f9be5db1093110f210ed1248022c885bf8838dbe50266c44a47cfc17

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.