Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Condenado a dos años de prisión por una 'estafa amorosa' de 84.000 euros a una mujer que conoció en Tinder

www.elmundo.esSpanishObserved 2024-03-12
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own ElMundo clipped report; no relationship mechanism, recovery, offence year or target country from location of court.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
sentence
reason
The own court report imposes two years; no actual service or finality inferred. Original authored interpretation: Own imposed two-year sentence, not actualservice. Original stage: imposed. Original scope: single_case. Whole row limits: No own absolute date, victimcountry, recovery or completed sentence service.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
reported_loss
reason
Own84000Euro extraction remains reported loss, without refund or proceeds allocation. Original authored interpretation: Own extraction amount, no refund or personalproceedsallocation. Original stage: reported. Original scope: single_case. Whole row limits: No own absolute date, victimcountry, recovery or completed sentence service.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f313b2a2defdf0beca7b37e3e3af098a73e4a7e55bcea5e5f8df65542157ca53
current source binding
input hash
3e0233f75dad2ff0e8b91187791385035d07ee05c8dca358cf7e161c32082848
decision id
12061255cefc73de6c92849052675f37e4dbef5f75c04233d1906afc0e0ae592
document id
3f4ba27985177972447725d838d855240e4f1f5e39f234c62a2058be6eb60ac0
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
6747fa97945e2b6f56fcdcaeb507152b6a80adefdfdd134c6bb9b45966e17d11
finding evidence sha256
a7d86228b70389e4db9aca7f6073dbf57bb347167bd51cfb95f295766d5e81c0
enrichment payload sha256
6695f0ee54748a9d8338e6639388eedaade25f3a81e827921e1920c98a8f65ba
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/3f4ba27985177972447725d838d855240e4f1f5e39f234c62a2058be6eb60ac0/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4a3afcc0dff7caa97403fe9366728689c7a44419292877ba6f8619665175a12a

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed

Reported extraction; no refund.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates

Justice proceedings and outcomes

convictionreported occurrenceStage: completed

Reported conviction.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: completed

Reported imposed term, not time served.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 3f4ba27985177972447725d838d855240e4f1f5e39f234c62a2058be6eb60ac0
Decision: 12061255cefc73de6c92849052675f37e4dbef5f75c04233d1906afc0e0ae592
Base reviewed revision: f313b2a2defdf0beca7b37e3e3af098a73e4a7e55bcea5e5f8df65542157ca53

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.