Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

【茨城新聞】ロマンス詐欺か、水戸の女性106万円被害 茨城県警水戸署

ibarakinews.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Japanese headline provisionally reports possible romance fraud and a Mito woman losing106man yen, with Ibaraki police attribution. Police attribution alone is not an investigation, arrest or conviction. No age, platform, transfer route, actor identity, event year or recovery is borrowed from other Mito sources.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Japanese headline provisionally reports possible romance fraud and a Mito woman losing106man yen, with Ibaraki police attribution. Police attribution alone is not an investigation, arrest or conviction. No age, platform, transfer route, actor identity, event year or recovery is borrowed from other Mito sources.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
ba9457654ff30f36e8292eebb50bc0b716cba2b3d4b96477db5765ec6ceb4762
current source binding
input hash
66e19944f413206b6f9ddbfc59c154ef6b8d202c5e7e003bc7edf2983fac60ff
decision id
fc36ea6b26fa0ce503982f90cc8ab397d10b2e58120a5d04b004aa3a7bdc0f38
document id
41f8ca74c4aded29af226f0172d0d2756490f41891d3b5903116fa5756eee923
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
05b64f496715b422a7397acfa2a2b6ec5344910623b5d47eb14b37e26ab07ca6
finding evidence sha256
5cc70687a5f101dc6c3a46ddfda8e2a276223a28ba0f6375c11f46739e8d68fe
enrichment payload sha256
fdcf9434696b3afcc54efe901f8c47b8ceb2746009ebe54ebb3359f74f34e1e9
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/41f8ca74c4aded29af226f0172d0d2756490f41891d3b5903116fa5756eee923/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
289735152446a391d78a9256e580e68dc0b66b2e6a2426025d52e2f4e98aaf11

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 41f8ca74c4aded29af226f0172d0d2756490f41891d3b5903116fa5756eee923
Decision: fc36ea6b26fa0ce503982f90cc8ab397d10b2e58120a5d04b004aa3a7bdc0f38
Base reviewed revision: ba9457654ff30f36e8292eebb50bc0b716cba2b3d4b96477db5765ec6ceb4762

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.