Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

New Yorkers lost over $30M to romance scams in 2023: Study

www.fox5ny.comEnglishObserved 2024-06-07
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own New Yorker population supports scoped victim/report geography. The explicit2023 is a statistical period, so no event-year/date proposal is added; no procedural actor is identified.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United States

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own New Yorker population supports scoped victim/report geography. The explicit2023 is a statistical period, so no event-year/date proposal is added; no procedural actor is identified.
subject
Own New Yorker loss-reporting population
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
The30.2million-dollar total and ranking are study-attributed aggregate reporting for2023, not verified incidence, a unique-person count, individual loss or a new2024 event.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
d48ca72a6500481c650da33ce7b2a9244a2fddbc4728393aec24d011bb47339a
current source binding
input hash
954bbc43a8484cb33103a1f52a8ef248daa7539414eb9f810177d124409969db
decision id
ab2cf6f0749d9507e5d5d3015031f4b682466b3c6c82481ebec73f7a449457d2
document id
48e727a1069d5b6dfc742c4b3397eae4c4c06913a0446f7acbac7138d1ff8c3c
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
d765b740be308ab645012681f1382ba5c74c031f93a431dcd4a18d06f80cd4d8
finding evidence sha256
c53193382571465c422464fd85393cef480af7066e1e13d90fcd8b52a5525dc4
enrichment payload sha256
c068d5eb4fb57dd3558429ade8199707c4f29d4caf15868153df787f59171f79
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/48e727a1069d5b6dfc742c4b3397eae4c4c06913a0446f7acbac7138d1ff8c3c/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
5358e3e594b21ab919dfb0a5631e18a6c002c91ddfc1db6943f93f9935d9e741

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 48e727a1069d5b6dfc742c4b3397eae4c4c06913a0446f7acbac7138d1ff8c3c
Decision: ab2cf6f0749d9507e5d5d3015031f4b682466b3c6c82481ebec73f7a449457d2
Base reviewed revision: d48ca72a6500481c650da33ce7b2a9244a2fddbc4728393aec24d011bb47339a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.