Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

¿Estafador de Bumble? La app bloqueo más de 2 millones de perfiles en 2024

expansion.mxSpanishObserved 2024-10-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own FTC-attributed2023 romanticloss literal1.14millonesUSD versusBumbleblocked>2mprofiles2024. Keep literalvalue/sourceperiods/denominators, blocking not measuredprevention/2mfinancialtargets. Source-specific qualification: Bumble blocked-profile count/FTC literal loss narrative does not itself state warning or support use. Withdraw warning application; preserve source periods, mixed denominators and literal1.14millionUSD.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own literal1.14millionUSD kept despite potential reporting error; not silently normalized to billion or allocated Bumble2mprofile blocks.
subject
FTC_2023_report
reported outcome
source_literal_amount
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
9ae97a4ef9c1e12eef700c6812df5aa916f53c7618cc10e35b9e1dd119fde09e
current source binding
input hash
3aba89d816ac8c3cb9abf4b8bfd3aae123bdefa9b17001996e86bbc0e22ca30f
decision id
99cd3e70616bf3bc0bbdfdaf51cba67ff87c62301d89eece0202898a7e8490a6
document id
4c180e69de63c93c68ef4feac6979af9f7d5248b05c50fcf5ebfa5843497ddf7
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
fb9df8d16547c7607db59465e023fb85dbfb09889240c48be56f67a1c93dab03
finding evidence sha256
d9c6bb35d6589472abf3176a5085e16831868d5e3b0c9b6d72e6230f3cf25ffb
enrichment payload sha256
31d10e2aab15b02fe4f22af0ae8145681d84ea5a753310b1f882a8a6a96f6c22
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/4c180e69de63c93c68ef4feac6979af9f7d5248b05c50fcf5ebfa5843497ddf7/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
06474fd8682a61fce62672ad607da24d094260b4088692080a981ea15e602a0e

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventioninsufficient context
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 4c180e69de63c93c68ef4feac6979af9f7d5248b05c50fcf5ebfa5843497ddf7
Decision: 99cd3e70616bf3bc0bbdfdaf51cba67ff87c62301d89eece0202898a7e8490a6
Base reviewed revision: 9ae97a4ef9c1e12eef700c6812df5aa916f53c7618cc10e35b9e1dd119fde09e

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.