Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

アプリで知り合った男性から投資の勧誘 30代女性、ロマンス詐欺で303万円被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-03
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Investment invitation by app acquaintance and Romance label do not state that an intimate relationship introduced investment. Relationship/investment/technology remain insufficient under the same venue boundary as earlier notes. Day2 not calendar year; no country proxy, promised returns, AI, actual trading platform, recovery or victim linkage.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Investment invitation by app acquaintance and Romance label do not state that an intimate relationship introduced investment. Relationship/investment/technology remain insufficient under the same venue boundary as earlier notes. Day2 not calendar year; no country proxy, promised returns, AI, actual trading platform, recovery or victim linkage.
field
interpretation
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
own role source layer limits
notes
Investment invitation by app acquaintance and Romance label do not state that an intimate relationship introduced investment. Relationship/investment/technology remain insufficient under the same venue boundary as earlier notes. Day2 not calendar year; no country proxy, promised returns, AI, actual trading platform, recovery or victim linkage.
actors
Item 1
role
targeted_person
field
desc
qualification
One woman in her30s, not age vulnerability.
Item 2
role
authority
field
desc
qualification
Announcement alone, no explicit investigation.
Item 3
role
unspecified
field
title
qualification
App acquaintance; actual identity/role details unverified.
countries
No listed value
developments
No listed value
explicit calendar years
No listed value
exact ROOT qualified record note
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
daecf4be36e7a4cab8527f8e84e952340dd7efdd3426590bb80b2898779857c5
current source binding
input hash
ea2d729209a23a684453b0909a73c62b1b5bc53d6ef0caf987e8659b1d3a41f7
decision id
0cd6b124da3e360f805b43d8a41879e801696059185e569efab08cc01536892c
document id
4d8aee50c362d2be05a9b5de4bd64714e18a0ff01247e4a0bd8c5f94f99d4fd5
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e41d15f093c1f8582bb25bce626774261ee1574ff3c9c80618cfbc3f571e2dc0
finding evidence sha256
558823cadcbd84bcb4241cf41780260b1a440329a0f0844d4058f6c74de3025d
enrichment payload sha256
8a69c604a4f02a3f37e803828d6cebc6f1b62f45fd22cd7d5e84a8cb2e4c7e93
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/4d8aee50c362d2be05a9b5de4bd64714e18a0ff01247e4a0bd8c5f94f99d4fd5/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
5711b469dd8b5ec3b1fc9115a93917b171b97f778dee9cde1506991ff287e0ac

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

Own3.03million yen, no net recovery-adjusted amount.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 4d8aee50c362d2be05a9b5de4bd64714e18a0ff01247e4a0bd8c5f94f99d4fd5
Decision: 0cd6b124da3e360f805b43d8a41879e801696059185e569efab08cc01536892c
Base reviewed revision: daecf4be36e7a4cab8527f8e84e952340dd7efdd3426590bb80b2898779857c5

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.