Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Commentary

Liebesbetrug: "Ich war 40, aber dumm wie Bohnenstroh"

www.zeit.deGermanObserved 2024-10-14
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own40self-dumb personalfalselover/money commentary. Selfstigma quotednotresearcherendorsement/clinicaldiagnosis orverifiedamount/rate. Financial wording describes women generally; self-blame is the single quoted subject, not a newly verified personal loss.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Quoted self-blame not endorsed by researcher/clinical diagnosis. Generic women lose money distinct single quoted subject, no verified new individual loss.
subject
self_stigma_and_generic_financial_claim
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
commentary
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
17770e3e23fab67217c4401796962de0b98467ece7b7982f227aa8d7d6d6f815
current source binding
input hash
939d43c61932e19a3719ed38621a8682e8033c009d638316e2b262cc5c690f18
decision id
1d8638d664efd21f658819c593e2222374baac1e862339b75bbb8cb9238f7076
document id
4e4bd3080e631f3fe549681e0b2e1c4d9aa1a9efbffeea87fff53949c61a9025
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
586e10a6520537161388d0477052ce143547cbbe2eb61a591705ca7df99aeffa
finding evidence sha256
f3b1b0e05ab5bd5214a5fc48cc9ec9261fc32862fde5743f2113ddc5a1887505
enrichment payload sha256
a5dcd4f318332b2ff35c2727f9f85a2be83a643e14b3c91d83af47baefee57aa
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/4e4bd3080e631f3fe549681e0b2e1c4d9aa1a9efbffeea87fff53949c61a9025/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
cd8e2f5eee3660e89275da1599d0eff7667ef26a059795a3b24d4b1b5a072241

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Blame, stigma and responsibility framing

self blamecommentaryStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingreported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 4e4bd3080e631f3fe549681e0b2e1c4d9aa1a9efbffeea87fff53949c61a9025
Decision: 1d8638d664efd21f658819c593e2222374baac1e862339b75bbb8cb9238f7076
Base reviewed revision: 17770e3e23fab67217c4401796962de0b98467ece7b7982f227aa8d7d6d6f815

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.