Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug mit «Rosenheim-Cops»

www.azonline.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Each of six own copies has the same explicit Internet-Liebesbetrug and publicized-case context. Retain only the supported online dimension while money and relationship mechanics remain insufficient. Copy count is not independent evidence or incidence; no person, geography or dates are added.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Each of six own copies has the same explicit Internet-Liebesbetrug and publicized-case context. Retain only the supported online dimension while money and relationship mechanics remain insufficient. Copy count is not independent evidence or incidence; no person, geography or dates are added.
subject
own_reported_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_inference_limits_retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
22890a8b3efa0bb0b4ba50a7efa43485564b4e336864696d35d7d0d6bfeeefc2
current source binding
input hash
89c3ca544bcb8a8628addb938af56af4ac00a1b0b971ed539d59608d6f2fe743
decision id
9912c634a20c1826d496618c058de08f7395c5ab9106c8b7e315946a41915f14
document id
60732f02cb8cb5f2da88d448213f0e6c0d00d965b38b9fbce74982f3ae4d5b48
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
d37ae0db848d186740f35772a3eada88b994decdc9bc23957af6624031d7c361
finding evidence sha256
b7b6b3daa84ce50aecac78ce3dac11f8614ff93396a953f27e6431f3a1fa53e4
enrichment payload sha256
f33972a7a0a5ed999848328e386cfdfeb015f761d5686fe5a4248addca3b73b1
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/60732f02cb8cb5f2da88d448213f0e6c0d00d965b38b9fbce74982f3ae4d5b48/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
335de410506cc0a35152d9b8b6ac34e7c4aaefafa572f13538011a8227386833

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 60732f02cb8cb5f2da88d448213f0e6c0d00d965b38b9fbce74982f3ae4d5b48
Decision: 9912c634a20c1826d496618c058de08f7395c5ab9106c8b7e315946a41915f14
Base reviewed revision: 22890a8b3efa0bb0b4ba50a7efa43485564b4e336864696d35d7d0d6bfeeefc2

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.