Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

「ロマンス詐欺」被害、大分県内で相次ぐ 5月に6件確認、計3千万円 - 大分のニュースなら 大分合同新聞プレミアムオンライン Gate

www.oita-press.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-01
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Headline reports six cases in May totaling3000万円. Description is boilerplate; aggregate is not verified unique incidence, and May has no absolute year.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Description is boilerplate; aggregate is not verified unique incidence, and May has no absolute year.
subject
people covered by the Oita romance-fraud aggregate
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Headline reports six cases in May totaling3000万円.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f7692e5a51fcef12eb1690635f68de0b339302f6cf4f3e0e6db596bc0211a962
current source binding
input hash
c423af14279db5c0fbb4fd7b64afa19a05b0c13e55351d25244df3a668609ef2
decision id
0b4c8cc39cea3048bb4d79d8d37e6a68c8972bbdd4f5e552a19da6a059d8c5cf
document id
66458f72b9ef56798785aecef804b0e017401d41c0729495e421ec900bdeb960
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
78e46a6f8a45e05046a02f198eca60216c195cac1e95d8ac99407e1506321ba2
finding evidence sha256
d429b78417e7b4b11fecbcdac779f7cfb26ee1611072ccfc214dd06df121ff82
enrichment payload sha256
36925a70d50eb2060314c710c578b1fdd47cac6c63ec003d5475cae3b1815f85
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/66458f72b9ef56798785aecef804b0e017401d41c0729495e421ec900bdeb960/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
d23e6cd49f0e3f5fdf85a6e021c858b9f546634aada833b8d3417678a80f5ac1

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 66458f72b9ef56798785aecef804b0e017401d41c0729495e421ec900bdeb960
Decision: 0b4c8cc39cea3048bb4d79d8d37e6a68c8972bbdd4f5e552a19da6a059d8c5cf
Base reviewed revision: f7692e5a51fcef12eb1690635f68de0b339302f6cf4f3e0e6db596bc0211a962

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.