Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

SEC sues ‘fake’ crypto exchanges in first action on pig butchering scams

cointelegraph.comEnglishObserved 2024-09-19
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own SEC twofakecryptoexchanges allegedlyRomance scammers/over3millioninvestors. Civil charges not criminalconviction, mixed investor amount not personalpaidloss or actualcryptotransfer. No explicit particularinvestment courtship mechanism.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
title
reason
Own civil SEC proceeding, not criminal indictment or conviction; fakeplatform label not crypto transfer.
subject
two_fake_crypto_exchange_accused_in_SEC_civil_action
reported outcome
civil_enforcement
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Investor aggregate not personalpaidloss/actualcryptotransfer/refund.
subject
SEC_investors
reported outcome
aggregate_claim
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
charge
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0a9a885e60adf26b43d6621b1b7bb9da3e48886e1295154e984e5b93bd521c3c
current source binding
input hash
e2d971fce4b3ac42c7065b2d2ce289685d28cd63f099f10565ea2af95bd154b6
decision id
3d5894f96a2dc37646f6cc60a9bfd77d2bc3e400af3878e4148b8a7371138dc7
document id
6b59df42014cfc2ab18640c7f29764e7c1aa9f332566942b76a0c33c65062861
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
fc60d21ef275cf5100bf0448ad603fc3168dfe65a046f2e1ea2d946e57532744
finding evidence sha256
7ea3382e157515aa3dc4b516c657a53f328861a31939be30e21fb09b871790b3
enrichment payload sha256
f1bed54389c09155d3c08f6121938a7eafd4a3b26e9b2c226655cf0e7be606cb
approved delta ids
Item 1
S35:subject:6b59df42014cfc2ab18640c7f29764e7c1aa9f332566942b76a0c33c65062861
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/6b59df42014cfc2ab18640c7f29764e7c1aa9f332566942b76a0c33c65062861/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
Item 2
json pointer
/current_own_source_subject_annotation_overrides/0
artifact sha256
9f371afc6f4184fdc2af3b5af5b418f4d8713c51b26f7ff7f9436015cd68b660
annotation key
82d4d331d496959f2ecb0d886a14bc98297b9c16f86da52a23a88dfb008a1521

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

chargereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 6b59df42014cfc2ab18640c7f29764e7c1aa9f332566942b76a0c33c65062861
Decision: 3d5894f96a2dc37646f6cc60a9bfd77d2bc3e400af3878e4148b8a7371138dc7
Base reviewed revision: 0a9a885e60adf26b43d6621b1b7bb9da3e48886e1295154e984e5b93bd521c3c

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.