Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own SEC twofakecryptoexchanges allegedlyRomance scammers/over3millioninvestors. Civil charges not criminalconviction, mixed investor amount not personalpaidloss or actualcryptotransfer. No explicit particularinvestment courtship mechanism.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific procedural contexts
field
title
reason
Own civil SEC proceeding, not criminal indictment or conviction; fakeplatform label not crypto transfer.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
desc
reason
Investor aggregate not personalpaidloss/actualcryptotransfer/refund.
subject
SEC_investors
reported outcome
aggregate_claim
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
charge
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 6b59df42014cfc2ab18640c7f29764e7c1aa9f332566942b76a0c33c65062861 Decision: 3d5894f96a2dc37646f6cc60a9bfd77d2bc3e400af3878e4148b8a7371138dc7 Base reviewed revision: 0a9a885e60adf26b43d6621b1b7bb9da3e48886e1295154e984e5b93bd521c3c
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.