Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug mit „Rosenheim-Cops“ | SVZ

www.svz.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own SVZ text places Liebesbetrug on the Internet but clips at In dessen Z. Keep generic online facilitation; actual loss details, impersonation/relationship mechanics, police investigation, warning and year are insufficient in this source. Stronger Rosenheim facts remain confined to their own URLs.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own SVZ text places Liebesbetrug on the Internet but clips at In dessen Z. Keep generic online facilitation; actual loss details, impersonation/relationship mechanics, police investigation, warning and year are insufficient in this source. Stronger Rosenheim facts remain confined to their own URLs.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source scope/stage/inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
982c7c7c918b2c820e9825a01b41110641cd0f300f1599fa049581e6391ee7a4
current source binding
input hash
f1a1e813ae75e96ffcb0ec1fb816e9b88b13ff831736c9c6f86d632fda4216d5
decision id
f474cc907722551a0592c6627b9f26cb0cb5c029aed3f0283adb5d5edcd12e49
document id
728b9c84260527d45cb7693020b8e32df7d9329a1f1421c72c8a0ddc33b6b8be
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
168bd98478ca5a392a6fb1691c14b6a30421426d766c9094890cef0c85be2419
finding evidence sha256
4de0329552bc0ebfc80b8cb79a0623d085e5b3cefd8ee9883387a5e5d78aa3ea
enrichment payload sha256
0592fd8f3151965b6ab2e572fcdd6c7b83fda84350646bb1313c76d988feace5
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/728b9c84260527d45cb7693020b8e32df7d9329a1f1421c72c8a0ddc33b6b8be/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4bb72471402dfc47dd183470ca3d87387e7b3bbce0ea90adfa683ae71688c078

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 728b9c84260527d45cb7693020b8e32df7d9329a1f1421c72c8a0ddc33b6b8be
Decision: f474cc907722551a0592c6627b9f26cb0cb5c029aed3f0283adb5d5edcd12e49
Base reviewed revision: 982c7c7c918b2c820e9825a01b41110641cd0f300f1599fa049581e6391ee7a4

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.