Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

ロマンス詐欺で大分県内の男女3人が計1248万円被害 - 大分のニュースなら 大分合同新聞プレミアムオンライン Gate

www.oita-press.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-16
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Only headline is subject-specific; description is publisher boilerplate and contributes no case facts. Romance label does not describe intimate manipulation. No country from Oita/language/yen, specific platform, calendar year, recovery or stronger narrative is imported from other reports.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Only headline is subject-specific; description is publisher boilerplate and contributes no case facts. Romance label does not describe intimate manipulation. No country from Oita/language/yen, specific platform, calendar year, recovery or stronger narrative is imported from other reports.
field
interpretation
context kind
ROOT_qualified_source_specific_current_interpretation
own role source layer limits
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
unknown role meaning
No selected approved assertion for that role; not a categorical source denial
unknown role reasons
date.incident
No selected explicit event-calendar literal; relative dates, publication/URL years and durations cannot fill this role.
country.victim
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
date.procedural
No selected explicit event-calendar literal; relative dates, publication/URL years and durations cannot fill this role.
country.operation
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
country.publisher
Publisher location is not selected as a core-case country.
country.jurisdiction
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
source truth verified
false
case identity verified
false
currentcoding34 SQL approved
false
ownrole assertion scope limits
Item 1
role
reported_development
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
reported_loss
exact reason
Combined loss involving three people; not three independent cases or allocated person amounts.
assertion index
0
final QC role code join not bypassed
true
exact ROOT qualified ownrole record note
PROPOSED role interpretations from saved admitted notes, not final country/calendar/development approval. Unknown is a proposal partition, not categorical source absence. All original actors/places/calendars/developments/amounts/limits remain exact in the separate three-layer history. No new SOURCE reading or independent truth validation.
all stronger current overlaps and21plus3U preservation still required
true
is entire code dimension denial
false
exact ROOT qualified record note
Only headline is subject-specific; description is publisher boilerplate and contributes no case facts. Romance label does not describe intimate manipulation. No country from Oita/language/yen, specific platform, calendar year, recovery or stronger narrative is imported from other reports.
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
reported_loss
reason
Combined loss involving three people; not three independent cases or allocated person amounts.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
b1932234f5d3d213315f7642b9f76e626c809e7010bb6713fe8f7899f32d5feb
current source binding
input hash
2b336e7cbeab01d8639f0b182b0fa26f5b73a52d92e1f9da9868237727de3bb7
decision id
a95ec1dc789266dd1a6bb37b4f10e3d4905c45beb9a9f47ce54b248d5ac038ac
document id
7940a8d408270e3268c9825646b86dd13c773151a5d3352921593fa23d7a655d
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
2e5eef5a4d9ab969850e4f3acbe5604598438460ab18126b0214cde0ceeaf32a
finding evidence sha256
3a57233dc6cfcb465a180f1551fe136ede6be26b0e32ceef4f480e911d45d636
enrichment payload sha256
261d6c463e7f2163419cf022dac3dfc101a37d8d4a9f4dee71b315d51fe8b7d3
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/7940a8d408270e3268c9825646b86dd13c773151a5d3352921593fa23d7a655d/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
3169159d34bcfcb2f2034c2a1cb28e5bb3d68111ed8e754a4369437617d49746

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

Three source persons and12.48million-yen total; not three independent cases or a per-person allocation.

Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 7940a8d408270e3268c9825646b86dd13c773151a5d3352921593fa23d7a655d
Decision: a95ec1dc789266dd1a6bb37b4f10e3d4905c45beb9a9f47ce54b248d5ac038ac
Base reviewed revision: b1932234f5d3d213315f7642b9f76e626c809e7010bb6713fe8f7899f32d5feb

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.