Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug mit «Rosenheim-Cops»

live.vodafone.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

This own clipped lead explicitly says Internet Liebesbetrug and that authorities publicized a case, then ends atIn desse.... It supplies no payment, persona, specific relationship manipulation, police action or complete case centre; identical wording across URLs is not independent incidence.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
This own clipped lead explicitly says Internet Liebesbetrug and that authorities publicized a case, then ends atIn desse.... It supplies no payment, persona, specific relationship manipulation, police action or complete case centre; identical wording across URLs is not independent incidence.
subject
own_reported_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_inference_limits_retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0187a1999a27ce217f7ab3c63dfaba6ce8006a239be7664bf950a3c08f29cf85
current source binding
input hash
dd8203ca9d1daf829ea764a0f7ed4b93b0205161fb848f122f3c9bc690128712
decision id
d39d881bb9382be0cf859484e928b92d68f355a6454176a295692364bfe05d84
document id
7ca477632d70ec2c6e5ee7ae5a391fcb2640efa2ef89bb59ddc92799135d5b37
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
ca3f2ea09325baad45a8dd1165966207e6d2bac56f7c14473565214dc50b53af
finding evidence sha256
635d846b83cd8d3d21d1baa9661a7e060a19c31ee5efee2560ca52abc7fb7f83
enrichment payload sha256
013235392dc66f2b9667ac2452a43e393f483d260c259467319619b1f34ae3e5
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/7ca477632d70ec2c6e5ee7ae5a391fcb2640efa2ef89bb59ddc92799135d5b37/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
08ce7d1bf08856419eeba7fa6e60bbdded3afacf9a163dc29778a418d8f39d39

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 7ca477632d70ec2c6e5ee7ae5a391fcb2640efa2ef89bb59ddc92799135d5b37
Decision: d39d881bb9382be0cf859484e928b92d68f355a6454176a295692364bfe05d84
Base reviewed revision: 0187a1999a27ce217f7ab3c63dfaba6ce8006a239be7664bf950a3c08f29cf85

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.