Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

Interpol traži da se termin "svinjokolj" ne koristi za žrtve ovih prevara - Naslovi.net

naslovi.netSerbianObserved 2024-12-22
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Serbian INTERPOL refers explicitlylove/investmentfraud andopposesdehumanisingpig vocabulary. Generalterminology/stigmachallenge notactualvictimdiagnosis, scientificreportingeffect orlegallyenforceableban. No newagencyincidence from repeatedcaption.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
d361ad9dd54f40d90325900b2032c291707daba764fe11e45f3e0b63237d3292
current source binding
input hash
111d1f5945500996acb09645042c4acce65cc4e564539cbc4b4383c27caab3e8
decision id
7f5acc6fb29b7ebdf761d9d5afb6522e8b41a5d0260824a5f954cf5567381177
document id
95a638b0d37a3a22c85321a0eeb7a8f566ae6265dbd5ffbe5dc386768fc9b77f
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
367c589f2d82cd39794b14fae368191d02729fb9fdaee5fa6dca618c718ee64a
finding evidence sha256
4597b6ba0b570451744e15ec2f289fb0c0f0918b5b51f0431a38f73b8cd386b4
enrichment payload sha256
6a1effb382e61c3efa0c4466443eb2eddaa22bdba60225b2251fc4678938d524
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/95a638b0d37a3a22c85321a0eeb7a8f566ae6265dbd5ffbe5dc386768fc9b77f/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4f36933e05ae4d6da2ae902230fd079079e06934add110c4dfe64c58704cdabd

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Blame, stigma and responsibility framing

blame challengecommentaryStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingreported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmnot reported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responseinsufficient context
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

Interpol Calls for an End to “Pig Butchering” Terminology

Each ownsource explicitly identifies the specific INTERPOL recommendation replacingpigterminology withromancebaiting or opposingdehumanisingvictimshame. This is a source-attributed terminology initiative, not statute/legalban, measuredbenefit, clinicalharm or allpig-fraudworks. GeneralItalianexplainer andArmenianwarning do notinheritinitiative membership. No prior specificinitiative match in bothpublishedyears; no rolloutday supplied.

Shared wording

Ne može "svinjokolj" - Naslovi.net

Own identicalSerbianparagraphs andsame38601458workpath support twoalias sharedwork, separatefromNportal translatedcoverage andunderlyingINTERPOLrecommendation.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 95a638b0d37a3a22c85321a0eeb7a8f566ae6265dbd5ffbe5dc386768fc9b77f
Decision: 7f5acc6fb29b7ebdf761d9d5afb6522e8b41a5d0260824a5f954cf5567381177
Base reviewed revision: d361ad9dd54f40d90325900b2032c291707daba764fe11e45f3e0b63237d3292

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.