Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Related mention

名義貸し、弁護士法違反で有罪 ロマンス詐欺救済巡り|全国のニュース|Web東奥

www.toonippo.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-09-11
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own explicit romantic-feelings money-deception definition and attorney-name-lending for victim-relief/legalprofession conviction. Provider offence not underlyingRomanceoffender conviction/actualrefund; clippedRMCname/individualterm notcompleted fromotherURL. Genericdefinition codedgenerally, no personalpaidloss asserted. Own TakeharaTakao83/Osaka1yr6mo imprisonment SUSPENDED3years/prosecutionrequest1yr6mo. Nottermserved/finality/underlyingRomanceoffenderconviction; courtimportantrole notforcedparticipation orseparatefraudnetwork. Day11noeventyear.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
desc
reason
Own1yr6mo suspended3yr/request1yr6mo, no served term/underlying Romance guilt.
subject
Takehara_Takao
reported outcome
conviction_suspended_sentence
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own explicit romantic-feelings money-deception definition and attorney-name-lending for victim-relief/legalprofession conviction. Provider offence not underlyingRomanceoffender conviction/actualrefund; clippedRMCname/individualterm notcompleted fromotherURL. Genericdefinition codedgenerally, no personalpaidloss asserted. Own TakeharaTakao83/Osaka1yr6mo imprisonment SUSPENDED3years/prosecutionrequest1yr6mo. Nottermserved/finality/underlyingRomanceoffenderconviction; courtimportantrole notforcedparticipation orseparatefraudnetwork. Day11noeventyear.
subject
Sep09_unit_66
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
sentence
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
6ea5e5a07e431406db8a3a73e664f98619580ca07821bb7b263bc3fbe185f7de
current source binding
input hash
0a2ed84377751055b7b387f59a0545da5125fd0c825a4847d6cfa0e6f08d0b88
decision id
d072a4e30f700396da60ca9dc7e96571278f0a5c1c34a19203bf493591ff8551
document id
96316c5904092e15ac84b1e2a411f92fc6b900c38aacb00da2b1774bbca059cc
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
421852201dc7c83fa4b274aff12db4f8c8f1d68cd68fe70dd37134b6839c3729
finding evidence sha256
08b214c2baab4d56a37ace2654dedb72342204a5ba34e8d9dc455bd9eeeac451
enrichment payload sha256
1d63428c0e36ec25405bc91da6184d19e4d409dee6824b5f9a838c732f7beaa2
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/96316c5904092e15ac84b1e2a411f92fc6b900c38aacb00da2b1774bbca059cc/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
19229ec51eb09e10be111cc954797337120ff01901dfc8fff0b83149f7cc9dfb

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Relationship-based deception

impersonationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

convictionreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: requested
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Involvement in other offending

other unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationinsufficient context
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingreported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

名義貸し、弁護士法違反で有罪/ロマンス詐欺救済巡り | 四国新聞社

Rare shared RMCattorney-name-lending conviction headline/lead and same professional-relief context support bounded reporting work across four copies. TakeharaTakao83/Osaka1yr6mo SUSPENDED3yr/prosecutionrequest1yr6mo only own fullcopy; sparse copies do not inherit name/term/finality/refund. Professional offence distinct underlying Romance offender conviction; no served prison term or coercion.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 96316c5904092e15ac84b1e2a411f92fc6b900c38aacb00da2b1774bbca059cc
Decision: d072a4e30f700396da60ca9dc7e96571278f0a5c1c34a19203bf493591ff8551
Base reviewed revision: 6ea5e5a07e431406db8a3a73e664f98619580ca07821bb7b263bc3fbe185f7de

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.