Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Love-Scamming: Frau (49) aus dem Landkreis Kelheim fällt auf Betrüger herein

www.donaukurier.deGermanObserved 2024-08-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own49-year-old Kelheim woman story says it first seemed a love relationship, then a rude awakening. This supports source-alleged fabricated relationship context; no money amount/payment method or explicit post-scam psychological condition is stated. BöseErwachen is not itself a clinical diagnosis. Two URL copies are not two distinct people or independent cases. No technique, court outcome, event year or refund imported. Root own-role qualification: Own Kelheim49female title/preview describes LoveScam/apparent relationship and discovery of fraud. No explicit paid sum, asset route, calendar date, actual legal outcome/refund or clinical harm; falling for a scam does not itself establish an unstated completed monetary transfer. Two exact copies are not independent cases.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Kelheim49female title/preview describes LoveScam/apparent relationship and discovery of fraud. No explicit paid sum, asset route, calendar date, actual legal outcome/refund or clinical harm; falling for a scam does not itself establish an unstated completed monetary transfer. Two exact copies are not independent cases.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_limits
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
715040e4970ce74629c7dca603925629cf01fd6f217af66617a8e49bff39b2d1
current source binding
input hash
b1716e28d205ab2f01784b9724c04be70d32389357d0483668b979367a761488
decision id
87d33f8c810a46e3d82f846f983dee3a94624bbfbcf242332a65469b606313e6
document id
ade2e9939689d11a76196770bbff989de9d91da6b0ff2a386fbb82152975b3b7
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
28a8badc0bc1d7036c46e6afb0a4566db32209babca01f42840450558837ee0d
finding evidence sha256
99481a8dcf561842a067c77f26bd2cbe43362dea8f5702c3bcf6dae123a48789
enrichment payload sha256
f74572557d0c6f1cb79fc095903f1b1d94ee6c84e84fd62f34145324a787a07a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/ade2e9939689d11a76196770bbff989de9d91da6b0ff2a386fbb82152975b3b7/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
5bdd0a5f32cbc457bd7726e26b8e1d7baed20687629ad38aff2218a9c2f13ae3

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: ade2e9939689d11a76196770bbff989de9d91da6b0ff2a386fbb82152975b3b7
Decision: 87d33f8c810a46e3d82f846f983dee3a94624bbfbcf242332a65469b606313e6
Base reviewed revision: 715040e4970ce74629c7dca603925629cf01fd6f217af66617a8e49bff39b2d1

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.