Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Il perd 200 000$ dans une fraude amoureuse: «Desjardins aurait dû me protéger», lance un homme de 84 ans

www.journaldequebec.comFrenchObserved 2024-06-15
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own 84-year-old man reports $200,000 Romance-fraud loss and crypto investments. Currency ISO is unspecified; investment is not proof of a crypto transfer. His assertion that Desjardins should have protected him is an attributed institutional complaint, not established misconduct. Age is context, not proven vulnerability. Romance mechanism details, event years, diagnosis and recovery are absent.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own 84-year-old man reports $200,000 Romance-fraud loss and crypto investments. Currency ISO is unspecified; investment is not proof of a crypto transfer. His assertion that Desjardins should have protected him is an attributed institutional complaint, not established misconduct. Age is context, not proven vulnerability. Romance mechanism details, event years, diagnosis and recovery are absent.
subject
own 84-year-old complainant
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
reported loss and attributed bank-protection complaint
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
22cccb06f941193d39f4601b8960e00803589dd44d7c615b7bcfb963f3be0baa
current source binding
input hash
3279cfebe35f270a806511c23ecc410c809a30e8c8134eb45b8137882d7da7eb
decision id
7076f6ee7615f79bf529e58030eead51795246694617e96d59cb2810bac10303
document id
aeec8ef40160ab6a95248a3eeca78dbfcda316c6a05800fd17d66925cd09f019
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
8b2bb50110a2789efd178c200ea952e28b381995190a702f63e29bb710d40268
finding evidence sha256
7aa237d03abcc8791bb63e1aa3d56504bf7024066473185dc74369040f639847
enrichment payload sha256
e6e7b85be3c30c550f179a28b57edf3edc25ede01ab6d0ca67dd5f39a25e42db
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/aeec8ef40160ab6a95248a3eeca78dbfcda316c6a05800fd17d66925cd09f019/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
9f95b86ed545a4999e7b773ab9b064b43c880a3055d8cd7c6623f51cf032838c

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Institutional barriers or harmful response

alleged misconductallegationStage: unclear
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsereported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: aeec8ef40160ab6a95248a3eeca78dbfcda316c6a05800fd17d66925cd09f019
Decision: 7076f6ee7615f79bf529e58030eead51795246694617e96d59cb2810bac10303
Base reviewed revision: 22cccb06f941193d39f4601b8960e00803589dd44d7c615b7bcfb963f3be0baa

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.