Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
MarkAcklom allegedhistoricalgirlfriend300000/2012; judge-removalbidfailednottrial/verdict/appeal-guiltdecision. Currentbodyunavailable. Current source-specific layer: All24 codes assessed. Own Poca/failed recusal proceeding explicitly connects MarkAcklom and CarolynWoods; court-fund/asset proceedings and proposed extension remain distinct from a new Romance incident.300000 five-count scope differs from other losses/assets. Later125000 compensation is a comparative stage in the saved review, not silently used as an additional completed own-source repayment or court order. Current financial metadata remains attributed, no double-counted target loss.2019 UK and later Spanish terms distinct; no new guilt/plea, completed proposed hearing, recovered/returned funds, serious harms, forged identity, investment, operator nationality or exact court day inferred. Current legal/story endpoint reconciliation remains pending.
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Researcher summaries preserve attributed findings and reading limits. Additional sources appear separately from the included collection.
Source text reviewed
MarkAcklom/CarolynWoods BristolPoca asset proceedings explicitlyconnect failedjudge-recusal bid to the already-reviewedWoods fraud.300000 fivecounts versusotherloss/assetfigures andlater125000compensation retain scopes.2019UKterm/Spanishlaterterm separate; source saysrelease2023. Proposedhearing extension notcompletedhearing, compensation order notreturn.
Open this source (opens a new tab)These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
MarkAcklom allegedhistoricalgirlfriend300000/2012; judge-removalbidfailednottrial/verdict/appeal-guiltdecision. Currentbodyunavailable.
Source-specific qualified interpretation is recorded separately. The assertion is attributed and is not a retained publisher quote or independent factual verification.
Proposed hearing extension, not a completed extended hearing; failed recusal bid separately preserved in context
Source-specific qualified interpretation is recorded separately. The assertion is attributed and is not a retained publisher quote or independent factual verification.
Reported historical2019 UK term, distinct from later Spanish term or all prison served
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | not reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | not reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
ActualStandard source namesCarolynWoods andBristolPoca inrefusedrecusal proceedings; laterSky record names sameMarkAcklom/CarolynWoods andordered125000compensation. Qualifiedreported progressionwithin namedasset proceedings, notactualrefund, newconviction or observation-date incident inference.
This record is linked to a later reported development.
Own namedMarkAcklom historical300000girlfriend2012 andactualStandard bodyexplicitCarolynWoods/BristolPoca supportearlierprocedural coverage inpreservedfamily. Ordered compensation versusactualrefund andotherSpanish/earlyfrauds remainseparate. No correction tosourcefigures.
Own exactMarkAcklom300000/2012 andfailedjudge-removal headline identifyPAworkcirculation. Newburyoriginalfailed; actualStandard fullsource separatelybinds namedWoods/Poca proceeding.
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: b42e982e510a6c00d069f1ff44cdc48f64c2b5b8c05c5208d17f67a0481b19e1
Decision: 0bba1e8443013515dabfb133aa6539615cd887a05fbbb60ca2e065c0e320ff3b
Current revision: 03a31d644f671be874fdc5820596b6d8ef6c71a79bba99bf61c1afc5d1a9fbde
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.