Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Arkansas man sues Las Vegas dancer for $38.5 million for alleged relationship fraud

news3lv.comEnglishObserved 2024-07-11
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

The own claimant alleges a decade of pretending romantic involvement and seeks38.5million unspecified dollars. Retain alleged fabricated relationship and a typed civil-filing context; a damages demand is not paid loss or compensation ordered. No existing criminal-justice subtype is forced onto the civil filing, and no online contact, sexual violence or clinical harm is inferred.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
desc
reason
This is a civil allegation/request, not a criminal charge, conviction, payment loss, compensation order or actual refund. Dollar type and exact filing date remain unspecified.
subject
Arkansas_civil_claimant_in_own_source
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
reported_civil_filing_and_requested_damages
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
The own claimant alleges a decade of pretending romantic involvement and seeks38.5million unspecified dollars. Retain alleged fabricated relationship and a typed civil-filing context; a damages demand is not paid loss or compensation ordered. No existing criminal-justice subtype is forced onto the civil filing, and no online contact, sexual violence or clinical harm is inferred.
subject
own_reported_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_inference_limits_retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
3374b6f3d3f0ce72754edf999abb3afccc14a680ce348ae9b6e69abd131e7dfc
current source binding
input hash
dfa1fa98f2fe6b5cf37fe3ac31f15954351b6fe59283d5cb37bffbb1f89f713d
decision id
c3cf6a193bfb83ac3d26b764cd6fb38aeccf436cfac1e8c5d7fa4513d5289f89
document id
b8291564c7049bce5a69c2a2242f503fe7850cb2ca42ff08a3cb74e6d4f3f92b
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
720c8a4ea7b0b78348b40b198a81aff297ceaf10d860fcb774f8ed8a46390a68
finding evidence sha256
6cb0b68fceba4a17fe6efcc0a15f4750316caec379b70686a8aaf20d9cda35ec
enrichment payload sha256
f75c3dbea6d3e73e5d7f0fac53c24d1d81d5d00648c3efbedf0cdb68d529f8a3
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/b8291564c7049bce5a69c2a2242f503fe7850cb2ca42ff08a3cb74e6d4f3f92b/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
0192f388b1fb24531380b2806479a468ed2000ecc2c534539073a856e298f7ee

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesinsufficient context
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: b8291564c7049bce5a69c2a2242f503fe7850cb2ca42ff08a3cb74e6d4f3f92b
Decision: c3cf6a193bfb83ac3d26b764cd6fb38aeccf436cfac1e8c5d7fa4513d5289f89
Base reviewed revision: 3374b6f3d3f0ce72754edf999abb3afccc14a680ce348ae9b6e69abd131e7dfc

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.