source specific procedural contexts
- field
- title
- reason
- Own professional name-lending offence only.
- subject
- attorney_name_lending
- reported outcome
- conviction
- is entire code dimension denial
- false
Source statement flags
- source truth verified
- false
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsRelated mention
名義貸し、弁護士法違反で有罪｜北日本新聞webunプラス
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
Story groups for this report
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
How to read this record
Own explicit romantic-feelings money-deception definition and attorney-name-lending for victim-relief/legalprofession conviction. Provider offence not underlyingRomanceoffender conviction/actualrefund; clippedRMCname/individualterm notcompleted fromotherURL. Genericdefinition codedgenerally, no personalpaidloss asserted.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
- field
- desc
- reason
- Own explicit romantic-feelings money-deception definition and attorney-name-lending for victim-relief/legalprofession conviction. Provider offence not underlyingRomanceoffender conviction/actualrefund; clippedRMCname/individualterm notcompleted fromotherURL. Genericdefinition codedgenerally, no personalpaidloss asserted.
- subject
- Sep09_unit_13
- reported outcome
- own_source_limits
- is entire code dimension denial
- false
Source statement flags
- source truth verified
- false
Current annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- 5ae87caca5ef8f3eb9f3c3d4bd6e3fc8fee4f321349c5f11124673546f8d7890
- current source binding
- input hash
- 5e542fa9a2bdb77e9a7a556ebe830bfac3d4200bc1b2f7ed340d45ebc02b6f4a
- decision id
- 5b8fb6c40b1eccd8f0a023e7af01972b176352290d25f9d33ad2561c7b0a0eff
- document id
- b8d7c6186753fa8081c615cc1df5d518a6b90994270b6886540e2be322eff440
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- 7be5c0f4de38ab48959d6b19ffbc1a6bf67c55379977c4235793609f31e18294
- finding evidence sha256
- 724f4928f21ba98f0d62a20760ba9dee89ccf77b5a0e7202a80eb7230292ab77
- enrichment payload sha256
- 49828e01bc6514ca4fb68ab69e2e182aac439fc852b1499b3a2016fa048336f3
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/b8d7c6186753fa8081c615cc1df5d518a6b90994270b6886540e2be322eff440/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 6c93f2d871dbc4fdd24d194627e7f874a9711af04900abdf1f02b2e4e7dfb8f5
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Relationship-based deception
impersonationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Justice proceedings and outcomes
convictionreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- authority
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Involvement in other offending
other unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | insufficient context |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | insufficient context |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | not reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
名義貸し、弁護士法違反で有罪／ロマンス詐欺救済巡り | 四国新聞社
Rare RMC recovery/name-lending conviction lead and named TakeharaTakao83 Osaka full context supports bounded professional proceeding.1yr6mo SUSPENDED3yr only198 fullcopy; unnamed clips no name/term/finality/refund borrowed, not underlying Romance guilt/served imprisonment/coercion. Distinct Kawaguchi39 and Kamoshita discipline.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: b8d7c6186753fa8081c615cc1df5d518a6b90994270b6886540e2be322eff440
Decision: 5b8fb6c40b1eccd8f0a023e7af01972b176352290d25f9d33ad2561c7b0a0eff
Base reviewed revision: 5ae87caca5ef8f3eb9f3c3d4bd6e3fc8fee4f321349c5f11124673546f8d7890
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.