Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Single mother loses almost RM150,000 in love scam

thesun.myEnglishObserved 2024-06-23
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own metadata reports a51-year-old single mother/civil servant losingRM148200; almostRM150000 is a broader headline approximation. No work-funds theft, vulnerability, recovery, police action or detailed romantic deception is supplied. Bandar Permaisuri is a dateline and clipped Setiu does not establish an actor-country role; earlier-this-month supplies no calendar year.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Age, single motherhood, civil-service occupation, dateline and yearless timing do not fill vulnerability, employer theft, country or incident year.
subject
the51-year-old single mother described in this URL
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
A reported loss amount with relative timing; no detailed deceptive mechanism or legal outcome is available.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
ab70951aa1afb3f4f27142a7880dcb540bba4111c1e2d351ad55728b4a582862
current source binding
input hash
f49193104c54b2d23eff5a87cf577c4fdb2e695a4c85ab095d8b75d8b2f1b0eb
decision id
b1a98a3a85eb94c6ef801cde8fd7e61d169169911bfdb7b0aefc86051e9fcb22
document id
bb5abf1fb7278caabb61c36b84ea1d4d7494222a6184854490a37771ca8cadc5
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
2d08bec9a1dbb65b50048e9dbda9e8d0ab486e268ea4ab8dabcd668496e6c970
finding evidence sha256
064f3734306506d9492cdf6643b3c219e97c46a27cffc20d775dbc580a01c250
enrichment payload sha256
991132230c8577c0c2f3ba41d97ec0ee8558889990044360a0cdeea8cc89177c
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/bb5abf1fb7278caabb61c36b84ea1d4d7494222a6184854490a37771ca8cadc5/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
61c53b890b0585eb7808b3bca7afd29d9a46b7c18e0528bab439b29ddfa15fd7

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Possible case connection

Wanita rugi RM148,200 angkara Love Scam

Own RM148200/Setiu lead permits a possible relationship between Malay and fuller English coverage; no age, occupation, motherhood, syndicate or platform detail crosses URLs and no unique person is verified.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: bb5abf1fb7278caabb61c36b84ea1d4d7494222a6184854490a37771ca8cadc5
Decision: b1a98a3a85eb94c6ef801cde8fd7e61d169169911bfdb7b0aefc86051e9fcb22
Base reviewed revision: ab70951aa1afb3f4f27142a7880dcb540bba4111c1e2d351ad55728b4a582862

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.