Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Romance scams continue to claim victims in Susquehanna Valley

www.wgal.comEnglishObserved 2024-06-03
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Broad monetary-loss and growth claim with relative period. Do not allocate billions to the local region, count unique incidents or fill four calendar years from publication/URL.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Do not allocate billions to the local region, count unique incidents or fill four calendar years from publication/URL.
subject
victims covered by the aggregate romance-scam claim
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Broad monetary-loss and growth claim with relative period.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
d9e0abcddea282b536f79728378487ee870709bcd66b422a8bf039dbcd07c82b
current source binding
input hash
56eb58341791b4f27d07d1533b2b3f0cff5926ebdb5860f5cfbe3c26d2efdc93
decision id
92d9420443f2a9a6b0fd92be428f33105e51441df1ecb37e002441f492880b5c
document id
c3a6ce52b2a6f2bf7018c2be84c9fb12611f2209533527490ed9c0f3b1097a58
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
4d860a98c7e6579a655d52b35cc36c576d95b8f93824a4209fe7f27139a1a0d7
finding evidence sha256
db6f803694785885a384915ee58b59c2c08ed239d8f70187aa97cef9492fdf3d
enrichment payload sha256
16fc1646880f61fd06353565046745308546748547226445b02842a28ed93b3a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/c3a6ce52b2a6f2bf7018c2be84c9fb12611f2209533527490ed9c0f3b1097a58/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
1c2272b9ef96282de38522393de92d0526bd0074f0bf77cc4a5ab717d61a5b87

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: c3a6ce52b2a6f2bf7018c2be84c9fb12611f2209533527490ed9c0f3b1097a58
Decision: 92d9420443f2a9a6b0fd92be428f33105e51441df1ecb37e002441f492880b5c
Base reviewed revision: d9e0abcddea282b536f79728378487ee870709bcd66b422a8bf039dbcd07c82b

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.