development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- single_case
- value
- reported_loss
- reason
- Keep reported_loss/single_case for the own approximate110mJPY layer, not a second amount alongside100m.
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
ロマンス詐欺で１億円被害、熊本
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Clipped とみ does not prove investigation action. Relationship/investment/technology remain insufficient despite labels/app venue. Do not import messages, affection or FX from longer own record47. No gender resolution, country from Japanese outlet, actyear from URL, diagnosis or separate-case count.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
Current annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- a9fdc1fa5bea4cb61137b8599df1fe6df519c2ee63ee0d669383cb9a2d831e00
- current source binding
- input hash
- 0de642a7bfc9bb05e23a318aaaf2f889d7808fd6144a2060eabd29f3f810b5ea
- decision id
- afc7e20274907c713536b102669e221a8ff591045b26005a200dc1b41055ce78
- document id
- c45c31fc8d952aae9d279dff5087aafd29b8403c8279bcd58915c3ba73c4d038
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- 2944568b190eeb813942ecb252770ccac093f865506e6e44d0017c16d14d04db
- finding evidence sha256
- 2e9a3938b337a4c91fd4abc64d3d19ea041a193270990553fbd66fea4ab342e2
- enrichment payload sha256
- 05232537e2eab211440f72cd550150715fcbfe0ecc1ff513a3e396786c26fd0c
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/c45c31fc8d952aae9d279dff5087aafd29b8403c8279bcd58915c3ba73c4d038/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 7c5f58a53f6b296a8e0b1b734dba5cc60660a9dee7ab7fac5b4de25d624d7025
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Financial and property harm
cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Own approximately110millionyen, not multiplied by duplicate articles.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- source associates
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | insufficient context |
| Technical facilitation | insufficient context |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | insufficient context |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: c45c31fc8d952aae9d279dff5087aafd29b8403c8279bcd58915c3ba73c4d038
Decision: afc7e20274907c713536b102669e221a8ff591045b26005a200dc1b41055ce78
Base reviewed revision: a9fdc1fa5bea4cb61137b8599df1fe6df519c2ee63ee0d669383cb9a2d831e00
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.