Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

'Love scam' the tactic most used by conmen, say cops

www.thestar.com.myEnglishObserved 2024-04-29
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Most-used comparison lacks own denominator/method; it is not a verified case count or awareness claim. No money loss assigned to KualaLumpur merely from dateline.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Most-used comparison lacks own denominator/method; it is not a verified case count or awareness claim. No money loss assigned to KualaLumpur merely from dateline.
field
interpretation
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
own role source layer limits
own actors
Item 1
note
Statistical attribution, no particular action.
role
authority
actor
police
Item 2
note
No named person or denominator.
role
targeted_person
actor
unspecified aggregate targets
analytical note
Most-used comparison lacks own denominator/method; it is not a verified case count or awareness claim. No money loss assigned to KualaLumpur merely from dateline.
reported developments
No listed value
own country role proposals
Item 1
role
dateline
qualification
Dateline only, not core target/operation-country allocation.
proposed country code
MY
core case country approved
false
approved for final country coding
false
requires validated source layer and gazetteer join
true
explicit calendar year bounds
Item 1
note
Own explicit period; not an individual event range or publication-year normalization.
role
aggregate_statistical_span
years
Item 1
2018
Item 2
2023
precision
year_to_month
event date approved
false
exact ROOT qualified record note
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f5a2a56461f40f7af5bfeca293c18e90f799d4413ad55c257613df55dc34bc10
current source binding
input hash
962aaf86335aced8ea46850f59bd3dbd48bb044cad1a38cc90b9dfb3306f84d6
decision id
3846e31661a50199cdca6927f779ef550b5e87ecd75b667fdbc224bad85815b9
document id
cc599c5aa466be0c238ceafe9ee7dfc67d9b82fea67c194725efe0a5a19abec4
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
5c8ed9561b0cef969079c6cc4f1f7bd2fe23d586c2e71feecdfd10ec0a4f811f
finding evidence sha256
9bf6f5670e9bcde37aa1b7ebf1016298e8c49785a43610e9fd5e19837efed9cc
enrichment payload sha256
c7b81f4ac3c8eeae2d3beedc6637ad1da0db02de03ecd7c5192437de44d5bec2
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/cc599c5aa466be0c238ceafe9ee7dfc67d9b82fea67c194725efe0a5a19abec4/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
c55c1bedf5e19979c470bd843031e4b54d038336e497e7290de3b962b99ac8fb

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed

Estimated aggregate, not confirmed unique incidence or per-person loss.

Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: cc599c5aa466be0c238ceafe9ee7dfc67d9b82fea67c194725efe0a5a19abec4
Decision: 3846e31661a50199cdca6927f779ef550b5e87ecd75b667fdbc224bad85815b9
Base reviewed revision: f5a2a56461f40f7af5bfeca293c18e90f799d4413ad55c257613df55dc34bc10

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.