Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

わずか4ヵ月で418億円騙し取る「SNS型投資・ロマンス詐欺」激増中

ascii.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-30
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own2024Jan–Apr police statistics separate SNS investment2508/334億3000万円 from Romance832/84億1000万円. Code reported aggregate financial harm with mixed-report scope; the418億 headline is not all Romance, unique incidents, personal loss or an individual event date.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own2024Jan–Apr police statistics separate SNS investment2508/334億3000万円 from Romance832/84億1000万円. Code reported aggregate financial harm with mixed-report scope; the418億 headline is not all Romance, unique incidents, personal loss or an individual event date.
subject
reported_January_April_statistics
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_limit
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
ff8c7d51328590900467fb5bb6c14adbfa61905f48a4535e7e2e9b2cf6589450
current source binding
input hash
d430ab36fb73b3559811f22012141a70f01052fbfe4f5df0610c2ade97f35e64
decision id
e5bf6e4330c7a386a2698386fb51d6ff85cfdfb94bee8031246afa39d74de557
document id
d68c964adff50589b0989ee46923cf947b3c87a0280840219c3c57935ec7aeba
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
5f73dadeb9006e69250f467995995b891369a220fc92f2ffee43b5567f0a87fb
finding evidence sha256
be4f521cdd43587ecb77041bf57da2be1f39299ffe72d91f003a00ee052c2fcb
enrichment payload sha256
a7791d152b7a1a527a80db9ca741eeba44ede9c43a4c9637db85dab7d917e08a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/d68c964adff50589b0989ee46923cf947b3c87a0280840219c3c57935ec7aeba/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
18a8a9515bc6bb5548ff0af2bafbbb63d883479a533618905b7cd62fc206f3eb

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: d68c964adff50589b0989ee46923cf947b3c87a0280840219c3c57935ec7aeba
Decision: e5bf6e4330c7a386a2698386fb51d6ff85cfdfb94bee8031246afa39d74de557
Base reviewed revision: ff8c7d51328590900467fb5bb6c14adbfa61905f48a4535e7e2e9b2cf6589450

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.