Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

£800,000 lost to romance fraud in Northern Ireland - PSNI

www.rte.ieEnglishObserved 2026-10-05
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

PSNI is cited for more thanGBP800,000lost to romance scams during last year. Preserve the description's lower bound and aggregate scope; the headline's rounded figure is not a new exact amount or victim count. A statistical reference period does not date an individual incident. The specific relationship mechanism is not supplied. No other harm, extension offense, enforcement/justice/assets/help/institutional event, investment/technical/organizational method, blame, prior circumstance or policy is stated. Police attribution alone is not an investigation or warning.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United Kingdom

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: aggregate
Reason: PSNI statistical attribution does not establish a legal jurisdiction for the reported losses. The explicit Northern Ireland victim population remains a separate supported victim-country role; jurisdiction remains unknown. The own-source GB report remains as originally interpreted within its stated scope.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

notes
PSNI statistical attribution does not establish a legal jurisdiction for the reported losses. The explicit Northern Ireland victim population remains a separate supported victim-country role; jurisdiction remains unknown. Original authored interpretation, retained as superseded history: The description explicitly locates aggregate romance-scam losses across Northern Ireland and attributes them to PSNI. This supports candidate GB mappings for the victim-loss population and police statistical jurisdiction, plus aggregate statistics. It does not establish individual case counts or offender locations. Last year is not normalized into an incident date; source and observation dates remain separate. Publisher geography is not inferred.
context kind
FILE-derived DATE20 notes and unknown-role qualifications
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; no native SQL producer, country inference, case identity or new semantic review.
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
date.incident
Item 5
date.procedural
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

source specific current qualifications

note
PSNI is cited for more thanGBP800,000lost to romance scams during last year. Preserve the description's lower bound and aggregate scope; the headline's rounded figure is not a new exact amount or victim count. A statistical reference period does not date an individual incident. The specific relationship mechanism is not supplied. No other harm, extension offense, enforcement/justice/assets/help/institutional event, investment/technical/organizational method, blame, prior circumstance or policy is stated. Police attribution alone is not an investigation or warning.
context kind
FILE-derived ALL24 review notes and explicit denials
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; an empty denial list adds no denial and changes no code state.
changes to explicit denials
No listed value
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
aggregate
value
research_statistics
reason
PSNI statistical attribution does not establish a legal jurisdiction for the reported losses. The explicit Northern Ireland victim population remains a separate supported victim-country role; jurisdiction remains unknown. The own-source research_statistics report remains as originally interpreted within its stated scope.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
93c82413f299c6916e3cb9b8dd0978f78d19119821b93f2a1ed48c26225a29f9
current source binding
input hash
c82fb612fc87ef0a16d215687fb7d9f680ceea0dcc908bec977a467385c6802c
decision id
f211269937af388e8648d9d5b0ec80081bde08d97c945964a16472d8777a0d77
document id
de367e80ee2c75ee3c217747057251d0858fdc682192148645c97dc360ed2b8e
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
621592d535a4a6f39f9dd6d56a7c1344ad0b4bec6e6a3227d0f46556c51e4515
finding evidence sha256
c4c1bed1aaa9510a41e983739e1e263a4d8cf743a620724a07ac052d95b00dfe
enrichment payload sha256
2713e0911a28ed85cabbaf3beb1141bf78f9a5c6d37e8e265f425a24d63e6ebb
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/selected_file_bindings/de367e80ee2c75ee3c217747057251d0858fdc682192148645c97dc360ed2b8e
artifact sha256
8697f0f4c180f298bab15d1d5da1db0f6d446f1702f9ccd542cb1a7b73742dab
annotation key
92c29c10fafff8ca5a9fa443fd10d0b83938a31a26884d410b82df3abf535ea1

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: de367e80ee2c75ee3c217747057251d0858fdc682192148645c97dc360ed2b8e
Decision: f211269937af388e8648d9d5b0ec80081bde08d97c945964a16472d8777a0d77
Base reviewed revision: 93c82413f299c6916e3cb9b8dd0978f78d19119821b93f2a1ed48c26225a29f9

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.