Skip to main content

“If U Don't Pay they will Share the Pics”: Exploring Sextortion in the Context of Romance Fraud

Cross, Cassandra ; Holt, Karen ; O'Malley, Roberta Liggett (2024) — Scams, Cons, Frauds, and Deceptions

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

Qualitative thematic analysis of de-identified Scamwatch dating/romance-fraud reports supplied by the ACCC, July 2018-July 2019. After removing 204 duplicates, researchers manually reviewed free-text narratives from 3,259 distinct reports and coded 258 cases explicitly describing blackmail/extortion based on an intimate image or recording. The analysis identified two gendered sextortion narratives: rapid image capture and blackmail among men, and relationship-based threats involving previously shared material among women. In reports containing relevant demand information, sextortion demands were exclusively financial; no additional images or sexual activities were demanded. The self-reported, unscreened Scamwatch data are not generalizable and may include overseas reporters.

Identified Gaps

Prior research had not empirically examined the romance-fraud/sextortion link in depth. Financially motivated sextortion is under-represented in empirical literature because offenders are difficult to identify, arrest, and prosecute. The study also identifies definitional uncertainty: many rapid, sexualised interactions reported as romance fraud may lack an established relationship or demonstrable deception and may instead constitute image-based abuse.

Methods

Qualitative thematic analysis of de-identified Scamwatch dating/romance-fraud reports supplied by the ACCC, July 2018–July 2019. After removing 204 duplicates, researchers manually reviewed free-text narratives from 3,259 distinct reports and coded 258 cases explicitly describing blackmail/extortion based on an intimate image or recording. Cases were coded with O’Malley and Holt’s cyber-sextortion codebook plus additional variables, then frequencies and thematic comparisons were used to assess typology fit and gendered victimization profiles.

Limitations

The self-reported, unscreened Scamwatch data are not generalizable and may include overseas reporters. Reports were not triangulated or routinely verified, so details depend on complainants’ recollection and interpretation. Free-text descriptions had minimal guidance, variable detail, and a 1,500-character limit; sextortion was coded only when documented, likely underestimating prevalence. Offender locations are uncertain, and reporting expectations may have shaped narrative content. The authors also note the small selected sextortion sample.

Future Work

Develop clear, consistent definitions distinguishing romance fraud, sextortion, and image-based abuse. Examine men’s sextortion victimization and gendered dynamics both within romance fraud and as a stand-alone offense. Use this understanding to improve prevention, intervention, education, and victim-centred responses; assess coordination between the ACCC and eSafety Commission.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.