Skip to main content

Service, game and livelihood, the new dimensions of neutralization techniques in Internet Romance Fraud: Extending the Neutralization Theory in Modern Internet crimes.

Lomatey Toku ; Martin Otu Offei (2023) — International Journal of Technology and Management Research

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The study surveyed 320 respondents at validated internet-romance-fraud hotspots, recruited through snowball referrals in university environments and internet cafes. A five-point Likert questionnaire measured established and newly developed neutralization constructs. Two IS experts and 18 offenders assessed face validity; a pilot involved 70 offenders. Offenders reportedly used condemnation of condemners, denial of injury, denial of victim, denial of responsibility, game, service, and livelihood to justify romance fraud. Service, game, and livelihood were presented as newly identified neutralization dimensions in internet romance fraud. The study was restricted to one West African country, limiting generalizability globally.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a prior lack of research investigating neutralization techniques in relation to internet romance-fraud intention. It further argues that existing neutralization literature did not capture the context-specific dimensions of service, game, and livelihood used by romance-fraud offenders.

Methods

The study surveyed 320 respondents at validated internet-romance-fraud hotspots, recruited through snowball referrals in university environments and internet cafés. A five-point Likert questionnaire measured established and newly developed neutralization constructs. Two IS experts and 18 offenders assessed face validity; a pilot involved 70 offenders. The authors used SmartPLS variance-based PLS-SEM, assessing reliability, convergent/discriminant validity, multicollinearity, and hypothesized paths to fraud intention.

Limitations

The study was restricted to one West African country, limiting generalizability globally. The anonymous and secretive nature of the offence made the offender population difficult to estimate, and the sample was conveniently recruited from known hotspots. The study measured intention through format, deception, and intention-to-defraud constructs, but did not measure actual fraud.

Future Work

Study the newly identified neutralization dimensions—service, game, and livelihood—in other crime contexts. The paper also indicates a need for legislation, prosecution, and law-enforcement approaches that account for evolving offender rationalizations.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.