Skip to main content

CATFISHING DALAM PENIPUAN ASMARA ONLINE di FILM SWEET BOBBY: MY CATFISHING NIGHTMARE

Widyaningrum, Sherlyna ; Utari, Prahastiwi ; Alkhajar, Eka Nada Shofa (2026) — Lektur: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (2)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This study is qualitative-descriptive, combining Identity Deception Theory (IDT) and Barthes semiotics to analyze nine scenes from Sweet Bobby: My Catfishing Nightmare. Primary data comprise dialogue, visuals, and scene content; secondary data come from literature on catfishing, IDT, and semiotics. The paper concludes that vulnerability is represented as arising from powerful digital signs and narratives rather than from a lack of vigilance. The film representation shows catfishing as the construction of a convincing digital narrative that makes a victim believe a fabricated reality. Limitation: The study is restricted to nine scenes from one film, limiting generalization to other media or cases.

Identified Gaps

The research is limited to a single film and uses qualitative, descriptive analysis, which restricts generalizability and may reflect researcher subjectivity. There is no empirical data from victims or platform-level analysis, and no cross-media or cross-cultural comparison. Future work should incorporate additional media objects, empirical perspectives from victims, and methodological triangulation.

Methods

Method: This study is qualitative-descriptive, combining Identity Deception Theory (IDT) and Barthes semiotics to analyze nine scenes from Sweet Bobby: My Catfishing Nightmare. Primary data comprise dialogue, visuals, and scene content; secondary data come from literature on catfishing, IDT, and semiotics. The analysis involved viewing the complete film, selecting relevant scenes, identifying signs in each scene, and interpreting denotation, connotation, and myth to reveal how digital signs construct false identities and affect audience perceptions.

Limitations

Limitation: The study is restricted to nine scenes from one film, limiting generalization to other media or cases. As a qualitative interpretive analysis dependent on visual and verbal signs, findings may be affected by researcher subjectivity and cultural context. The denotation-connotation-myth approach may overlook alternative readings or audience reinterpretations. No empirical data from real respondents are included, so the results describe representations rather than actual catfishing behavior.

Future Work

This study could be extended by analyzing catfishing representations across multiple media (documentaries, films, social media content) and by triangulating with interviews or testimonies from real victims to assess real-world impact. Additional theories could be applied to broaden interpretation (beyond IDT and Barthes) and mixed-methods approaches could examine audience reception, digital literacy interventions, and effectiveness of educational strategies to prevent identity deception online.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.