Skip to main content

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

A qualitative single-case investigation examined a UK victim's Elite-Bit pig-butchering experience using interviews, correspondence, bank statements, platform login records, and victim-provided identifiers. The researchers evaluated platform red flags; conducted on-chain transaction tracing with Breadcrumbs; performed off-chain OSINT on the Tinder profile, phone number, domain, Gmail account, and platform records; and applied the 11P method and Maltego link analysis to map relationships among the victim, suspect, transactions, domain, and social-media entities. The authors conclude that enhanced regulation and public awareness are urgently needed in response to cryptocurrency scams. The on-chain analysis found that the victim and her friend transferred a total of 5.4910 ETH to Elite-Bit. The investigation was constrained by limited victim-provided inputs and few transactions between victim and scammer.

Identified Gaps

The analysis lacked key attribution evidence: Binance subpoena results, Gmail headers, and subscriber information for the mobile number and protected domain registration. Transactions indicating additional victims were identified but were outside this paper’s scope. The authors also infer that other UK women may be targeted, but do not test this systematically. As a single victim case, the study does not establish the prevalence or generalisability of the identified scam pattern.

Methods

A qualitative single-case investigation examined a UK victim’s Elite-Bit pig-butchering experience using interviews, correspondence, bank statements, platform login records, and victim-provided identifiers. The researchers evaluated platform red flags; conducted on-chain transaction tracing with Breadcrumbs; performed off-chain OSINT on the Tinder profile, phone number, domain, Gmail account, and platform records; and applied the 11P method and Maltego link analysis to map relationships among the victim, suspect, transactions, domain, and social-media entities.

Limitations

The investigation was constrained by limited victim-provided inputs and few transactions between victim and scammer. Binance account-holder and outgoing-transaction data were unavailable because a subpoena required UK law-enforcement action and no response had been received. The victim could not provide the Gmail header, limiting IP/location analysis. Reverse-image and standard phone-number OSINT searches yielded no positive results. Evidence of other victims was identified but excluded from the study scope.

Future Work

Obtain a UK law-enforcement subpoena to Binance, then use account-holder information and outgoing transactions for further off-chain analysis. UK law enforcement should use the on-chain and OSINT evidence promptly to assist this and other victims and potentially identify linked offenders. The victim may also seek support and cooperation through international agencies such as Interpol and Europol.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.