Skip to main content

Facebook as a Tool of Catfishing: An Analytical Study of University Students

Maheen, Sidra ; Ghani, Abdul ; Syed, Anam (2023) — Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.71016/hnjss/j4ve9n46 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Pakistan
Tags:   Catfishing, Cybercrime, Digital Vulnerability, Facebook, Fake Profiles, Online Impersonation, Pakistan, University Students
Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication examines Facebook as a medium for catfishing among university students, aiming to illuminate how deceptive online personas are used to manipulate and exploit others. The study frames catfishing as a form of online impersonation that can lead to financial and personal harm, and it situates Facebook as a primary vehicle for such deception. The researchers conducted a quantitative survey (N = 387) at two Pakistani universities to assess perceptions of Facebook’s role in catfishing and to gauge digital vulnerability among students. Methodologically, the study employs a survey design and analyzes responses with chi-square statistics to test the association between Facebook usage and catfishing. The results indicate that a substantial portion of respondents perceive Facebook as a major tool for catfishing, with a higher proportion of female participants reporting awareness or concern about catfishing on the platform. The analysis suggests a statistically significant relationship between Facebook use and attitudes toward catfishing, supporting the study’s central claim that Facebook functions as a common channel for deceptive romantic encounters among students. In terms of implications, the authors advocate for protective measures, including stronger password practices and reduced acceptance of unfamiliar friend requests, and they emphasize the role of law enforcement—in this case, Pakistan’s FIA—in addressing online abuse. The discussion notes that many victims do not report incidents and that digital vulnerability contributes to cybercrime risk. The article acknowledges limitations related to its scope and emphasizes awareness and preventive action as practical responses, while remaining grounded in the study’s reported findings.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The paper identifies a gap in platform-specific research: prior work addressed catfishing impacts, online dating scams, money fraud, psychological issues, and romance scams, while this study examines Facebook as a setting for same- and cross-gender catfishing for personal gain. It also notes that prior research recommended additional work on cybervictimization and social-network misuse.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The study used a quantitative, positivist survey design. A convenience, nonprobability sample of 387 male and female social-science students from the University of Punjab and Minhaj University completed a questionnaire. Data were analyzed in SPSS using cross-tabulations and chi-square tests to examine the association between Facebook use and catfishing.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The evidence is based on a nonprobability convenience sample drawn from social-science students at two universities, limiting generalizability beyond this student population. The survey measures respondents' perceptions rather than verified victimization or offending. The reported chi-square table also notes that 40% of cells had expected counts below five, which may weaken the reliability of the test inference.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Evaluate interventions that discourage acceptance of unknown Facebook friend requests and assess whether community education about fake profiles increases reporting to Pakistan's Federal Investigation Agency.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.