Skip to main content

A Research on False Pragmatic Identity Construction in Telecom Network Dating Scam

Lu, Jiaxuan (2023) — Modern Linguistics

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This qualitative pragmatic case study analyzes text conversations from one documented telecommunications dating scam presented in the legal-affairs program Yixian. Using pragmatic-identity theory, it identifies three false identities constructed by the offender: an investment expert, a purported friend, and third-party personas. Relevance theory is then used to interpret how strong and weak cues, changing context, and shared assumptions helped the victim accept those identities before recognizing the deception. The paper demonstrates how one scam can coordinate several personas and conversational roles, but it does not establish that the pattern is common. Its account depends on a single mediated case and qualitative reconstruction of the victim's cognitive process from messages, self-report, responses, and program commentary.

Identified Gaps

The study is a close analysis of one dating-scam case, leaving uncertainty about whether the identified identity types, discourse choices, and inferred victim-recognition mechanisms generalize across cases, victims, platforms, or other telecom-fraud forms.

Methods

Qualitative pragmatic discourse case study of a real telecom network dating scam drawn from the legal-affairs program Yixian. The author analyzed text conversations between the fraudster and victim using pragmatic identity theory, then used relevance theory’s strong/weak communication and dynamic cognitive-environment concepts to interpret impression management and the victim’s recognition of false identities. Victim self-reports, responses, and official commentary informed deductions about cognition.

Limitations

The paper analyzes a single documented case and qualitatively deduces the victim’s possible cognitive process from conversation, self-report, responses, and program commentary. It does not test causal effects, estimate prevalence, or establish generalizability of the proposed identity patterns and cognitive mechanisms.

Future Work

Extend the strong/weak communication and pragmatic-identity framework to other telecom-fraud impersonation types, including e-commerce/logistics customer-service, public-security/procuratorate/court, and epidemic-related scams.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.