Skip to main content

Space transition theory and its empirical applications in cybercrime research: a PRISMA-guided systematic review (2007 to 2025)

Suleman Lazarus ; Yushawu Abubakari (2026) — Crime, Law and Social Change

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This PRISMA-guided systematic review examines Space Transition Theory (STT) and its empirical applications in cybercrime research from 2007 to 2025, identifying 19 peer-reviewed studies that explicitly engage with STT. The authors categorize the evidence base by research design (10 qualitative, 7 quantitative, 2 mixed-methods) and by cybercrime contexts, including cyberbullying, online romance and grooming, cryptocurrency fraud, and other online offenses. The study documents STT’s core claims—such as identity flexibility, dissociative anonymity, and spatial disinhibition—as useful for analyzing how digital platform affordances shape offline-to-online behavioral transitions. It also notes STT’s alignment with Human-Computer Interaction concerns about how interface design can mediate conduct. At the same time, the review highlights several limitations. STT shows uneven explanatory reach, often under-specifying sociocultural meaning-making, structural inequality, and platform-specific architectures. Many studies supplement STT with additional theories (e.g., cultural, structural, or digital-sociology perspectives), and several critiques call for incorporating material and contextual factors—such as digital exclusion, economic precarity, and spiritual or cultural logics—into the framework. The authors conclude that STT remains a useful mid-range scaffold for studying behavioral discontinuities across spaces but should be recalibrated and integrated with interdisciplinary approaches. They advocate a hybrid model that preserves STT’s emphasis on anonymity and mobility while embedding it within structural, cultural, and design-informed analyses to better capture the realities of contemporary cybercrime. Limitations include language bias and the focus on studies that explicitly apply STT, potentially omitting relevant but non‑explicit usages.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.