Skip to main content

Romance Scam Victimization: A Survey-Based Examination of Financial, Psychological, and Reporting Factors

Herrera, LD (2025) — 2025 13th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)

DOI: 10.1109/isdfs65363.2025.11012081
Type:   Proceedings Article
Country:   United States
Tags:   victim experience, psychology, AI misuse, Artificial Intelligence, measurement, romance scams, financial loss, psychological distress, suicidal ideation, underreporting, help-seeking, informal support, victim assistance, help seeking, formal reporting, older adults

Synopsis (AI-Generated)

Romance scams constitute a rising form of cybercrime in which perpetrators cultivate deceitful romantic relationships to extract financial resources, causing substantial economic and psychological harm while remaining markedly underreported. Official figures from 2022 indicate that 1.3 billion dollars were lost to romance scams in the United States, though the actual toll is believed to be higher. The study summarized here investigates this phenomenon by examining how victims experience financial and psychological consequences, identifying patterns in victimization, and describing barriers to seeking help as well as how victims perceive the assistance they receive. Drawing on survey responses from 366 victims, the research analyzes both financial losses and psychological impact, along with reporting patterns, obstacles to obtaining help, and victims’ views on the help obtained. A notable portion of participants, 60.9 percent, did not pursue assistance from any source, whether formal institutions or personal networks. A chi-square test with 1 degree of freedom (N = 366) yielded a statistic of 13.94 and a p-value less than 0.001, indicating that those who rely exclusively on informal support are significantly less likely to engage formal reporting mechanisms. In addition, the results show an association between the magnitude of financial losses and the prevalence of suicidal ideation, with greater losses linked to higher rates of such thoughts. The findings suggest that enhancing the performance and the perceived usefulness of formal institutions could increase their utilization, improve reporting accuracy, and lead to better outcomes for victims. The authors recommend further research to evaluate potential improvements, including the establishment of a centralized victim assistance organization, as a means to improve victim outcomes and mitigate both financial and psychological consequences.

Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)

The specific effect of informal assistance on formal-reporting decisions among romance-scam victims is understudied. The paper also identifies unanswered questions about comparative underreporting versus other frauds, mechanisms through which manipulation, self-blame, and cynicism affect disclosure, financial-status differences in psychological impact, and whether reporting choices reflect preference or adverse experiences. Evidence for the observed loss–suicidal-ideation association was descriptive rather than statistically confirmed.

Methods (AI-Generated)

A structured, predominantly closed-ended SurveyMonkey survey examined US adult self-identified romance-scam victims’ demographics, victimization frequency, losses, psychological consequences, transfer methods, help-seeking, reporting, and perceived helpfulness. Facebook advertising recruited participants during August 2024; 366 eligible respondents completed the survey. Responses included preset categories and four-point helpfulness ratings; optional open-text responses were coded quantitatively rather than systematically analyzed. Analyses reported descriptive statistics, correlations, and a chi-square test of informal versus formal help-seeking.

Limitations (AI-Generated)

Self-reported responses may involve recall bias, exaggeration, misinterpretation, and self-selection bias, limiting representativeness. The survey had no incident time limit, so older events may have reduced memory accuracy. Helpfulness was respondent-defined and therefore variable across participants; its four-point scale lacked a neutral midpoint and may have inflated positive ratings. Open-ended answers were not systematically analyzed. One internally inconsistent high-loss response was omitted from loss analyses.

Future Work (AI-Generated)

Test methods to improve formal and informal support accessibility; compare romance-scam underreporting with other fraud and identify causes; assess effects of emotional manipulation, self-blame, and law-enforcement cynicism on disclosure; examine whether financial status moderates psychological effects of loss; determine whether reporting-channel choices are intentional or shaped by negative experiences; test whether educating family and friends increases formal reporting; and evaluate feasibility, trust-building, and integration of a centralized victim-assistance organization.

Related Research Insights

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.

AI-Generated Content Notice

The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.

Found a possible error? Request a correction.