Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Liebesbetrug: 35.000 Euro an falschen „Rosenheim-Cops“-Schauspieler übergeben

www.donaukurier.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own headline states35,000EUR handed to a false Rosenheim-Cops actor. The short description only says authorities publicized a special case; it does not establish an investigation, complaint or warning. No real actor culpability, politician-mother relationship, year or fuller-copy facts are imported.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own headline states35,000EUR handed to a false Rosenheim-Cops actor. The short description only says authorities publicized a special case; it does not establish an investigation, complaint or warning. No real actor culpability, politician-mother relationship, year or fuller-copy facts are imported.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source subject, loss, stage and inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
c588b0d0c3f669b3884932c4b381d64a15597bb2bc5f7986009dd44b3c15aaae
current source binding
input hash
31ed4bcba223adcbc02fdc6062ed32d1da35e7c3bff9b8d1609cb11ee9a5d504
decision id
e1384cb5da66f110e6cdc29c9b7039909ca056b74a56d317b488030868860a09
document id
0da3ae9bae019be0ecca380daca1794eb11c47119e12bd0b0ed3079a3425e3a2
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
689192b558ce600c3324056c30e8ddccf5a32008dc2af666ac6218150483563d
finding evidence sha256
9f2e43e4928aacd574213142e066f961bbdb5e369815a32afcfc5fadef6a2198
enrichment payload sha256
826183b1f2ee159033b6b56f6c837ce04bf0c6489c8a33be2b2ff200a5bee275
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/0da3ae9bae019be0ecca380daca1794eb11c47119e12bd0b0ed3079a3425e3a2/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
810f40f7f09811ca1ffadd15be36ebddbc5bae547498fccf2d6cfa3f54093af8

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responseinsufficient context
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 0da3ae9bae019be0ecca380daca1794eb11c47119e12bd0b0ed3079a3425e3a2
Decision: e1384cb5da66f110e6cdc29c9b7039909ca056b74a56d317b488030868860a09
Base reviewed revision: c588b0d0c3f669b3884932c4b381d64a15597bb2bc5f7986009dd44b3c15aaae

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.