Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

ロマンス詐欺で200万円被害 青森県の男性

www.47news.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-08-19
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Aomori50smale200manJPY SNSRomanceinvestmentloss. No assetroute/persona/country/eventyearfrom19th orclinicalcause/refund.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Aomori50smale200manJPY SNSRomanceinvestmentloss. No assetroute/persona/country/eventyearfrom19th orclinicalcause/refund.
subject
Aug19_unit_19
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
3ed0d9c1ea58c24eaf77d2cf55c15f84fa3713c207b5c8aebc01c2634bbf602e
current source binding
input hash
c478adc8e04a229511f637137228be382ca648de42ea2014294794c60bdd2486
decision id
880282a3fba41ba5a8cb1b9cc111e5158560b3b2905c3efab26f13aefcb53869
document id
0f6a96ab7d0c78ceaa19c4edea4a94c576339aad5ef8d1ba6b48b23c0ff43822
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
6663cba39db3d33c2a61045097de20e2275c2c3493b1962a4f8cb42449b1664c
finding evidence sha256
73cd14731c83212e14c0fc687b2dfa8d5f08d3edb97dd111f6c5310d52de22db
enrichment payload sha256
1badd56348448c1c821c331273669de32d3797fbadfa4f2fd3f60add75e362a3
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/0f6a96ab7d0c78ceaa19c4edea4a94c576339aad5ef8d1ba6b48b23c0ff43822/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
7f7ecd6c4ac3daef39971d5ce990e7163446ddf55b58a642d38b8722086d2f3b

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 0f6a96ab7d0c78ceaa19c4edea4a94c576339aad5ef8d1ba6b48b23c0ff43822
Decision: 880282a3fba41ba5a8cb1b9cc111e5158560b3b2905c3efab26f13aefcb53869
Base reviewed revision: 3ed0d9c1ea58c24eaf77d2cf55c15f84fa3713c207b5c8aebc01c2634bbf602e

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.