Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
Repeated I-love-you statements support the confidence narrative but are not repeat targeting after intervention. SNS acquaintance alone no technical function. International label does not name cross-border actors/countries. Day22 not year; no clinical harm, paymentcurrency beyondyen, investigation/arrest, recovery or age vulnerability.
Evidence basis: saved title description
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
About150millionyen, no net-loss/refund assumption.
Explicit exploitation of affection to introduce FX, not mere adjacency.
Relationship-led FX pretext, no genuine returns or exchange transactions.
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | insufficient context |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 179bbf9cd04389a0edfdcdcdc7c3808d4846b20152ec5ed3d4ffca4def511f23
Decision: cccc6f978f438c76bf0b376edb8c1abbbb2273ad1a3784a7122b8b4a44d5d542
Base reviewed revision: 1380d32a63cc2e8cc394442001108cf571afe71b5f81efa62f3b8b4ed1ec6b51
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.